Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary vs the NRA
Gun Watch ^ | 21 September, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 09/29/2016 9:32:25 AM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Billthedrill

“There isn’t any good faith negotiation and everybody knows it.”

That point is what needs to be hammered home again and again.


21 posted on 09/29/2016 10:54:00 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Hillary hasn’t got much else to campaign on. The MSM loves gun control, so there you go. The RATS are reduced to dragging out ex-beauty queens turned criminal and claiming Trump is on cocaine, so they have to appeal to the gun control sissies.


22 posted on 09/29/2016 11:26:21 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Hillary must believe that the demographics have flipped in her favor

The only thing that’s flipped is......Hitlery!


23 posted on 09/29/2016 11:38:09 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

” It is not that the NRA has a direct quote of Hillary Clinton saying that she wants to confiscate all American’s guns in her first term.”

Except we do. I have seen her hold up Australia as a model we should follow. Guess what happened in Australia. That’s right, gun confiscation.


24 posted on 09/29/2016 11:38:42 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr

Even in Australia, they did not confiscate all the guns, and they did not go door to door confiscating guns.

They confiscated less than 20% of the guns.

What they did was put in place extremely rigid, difficult policies to obtain, keep, and use guns.

But those policies failed to keep Australians from buying, keeping , and using guns. There are more gun owners in Australia now than there were then, and just as many legal guns, though not as many legal types of guns.


25 posted on 09/29/2016 2:03:26 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I love the graphic about the NRA.

The favorable flipped to exceed unfavorable between 1994 and 1997...

Now let me think... who was president at that time?

Thinking...
Still thinking...

I know!

Hillary Dianne Rotten!
And her husband!!

Who'da thought?

26 posted on 09/29/2016 5:32:17 PM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longfellow
As a 16-year Freeper, you might want to rephrase that.

Think "lampposts..."

27 posted on 09/29/2016 6:01:02 PM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
What's AWB?

I am a life member of AAAAA, and can't do acronyms...

28 posted on 09/29/2016 6:08:26 PM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: publius911

Assault Weapon Ban


29 posted on 09/29/2016 6:44:03 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: publius911
What's AWB?

Sorry, Assault Weapons Ban of '94. It gave us all a very clear idea of the way the thing was headed, and just how treacherous the gun control side in general and the Clintons in particular, were. The initial spin was that they were working with the NRA to create a "reasonable, common-sense" bill - sound familiar? - anyway, as soon as it passed the spin reversed 180 degrees and it was, "We stood up to the evil NRA and beat them." BJ Billy actually was quoted as saying "I'm going to stretch this as far as I can," and that's exactly what they did.

Now, that left the NRA leadership in a decidedly awkward position, both with its members, who realized full well that they'd been suckered, and with the media, who were definitely using the thing to mock and undermine said leadership with an eye to discrediting the organization. What actually happened was a change in leadership and a hardening of position. And the NRA came out of the thing stronger, more determined, and in the full knowledge that compromise on the issue only led to betrayal.

30 posted on 09/29/2016 8:14:36 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson