Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question for gun control advocates: How much is enough?
guns.com ^ | Aug. 11, 2016 | Greg Camp

Posted on 08/12/2016 10:46:27 AM PDT by PROCON

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: DugwayDuke
Suppose, there is a mass casualty shooting, say 30 killed, and we ban all magazines over 20 rounds.

The human mind always finds a go-around. California bans 30-round magazines. These clips, hold three 10-round Ruger 10-22 magazines. As of today, they are legal in CA (rapid fire contestants love 'em):

41 posted on 08/13/2016 9:02:46 AM PDT by Oatka (Beware of an old man in a profession where men usually die young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

I had like 400 weapons of various description til that Sharkanado nuclear tornado came thru, nuthin but glow everywhere now


42 posted on 08/13/2016 9:07:24 AM PDT by advertising guy ( TRUMP , BUT VERIFY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oatka

My point was there is no acceptable middle ground. Regardless of what you ban, the gun banners will always find a justification for more bans. They simply do not see any reason why anyone other than the police or military should have firearms of any type.

Well, I did meet one gun banner who was flexible. He allowed as how he could support gun clubs. Any one who wanted to fire a gun would have to join a club. You could own your own gun but would have to keep it at the club.

If you wanted to shoot, then you could go to the club and shoot there and only there. You would have to buy all ammunition from the club and turn-in all brass and un-expended ammunition.

Hunters could join a similar type of hunting club but would have to be accompanied by a licensed hunting guide at all times.


43 posted on 08/13/2016 11:39:50 AM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
My point was there is no acceptable middle ground. Regardless of what you ban, the gun banners will always find a justification for more bans.

Fully concur.

44 posted on 08/13/2016 1:18:08 PM PDT by Oatka (Beware of an old man in a profession where men usually die young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson