Skip to comments.
Question for gun control advocates: How much is enough?
guns.com ^
| Aug. 11, 2016
| Greg Camp
Posted on 08/12/2016 10:46:27 AM PDT by PROCON
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Any person who has been paying attention to democrat politicians over the years knows gun registration and confiscation is the end game.
They just won't come right out and say it.
A lot of good info at link of the history of American gun laws.
1
posted on
08/12/2016 10:46:27 AM PDT
by
PROCON
To: PROCON
Absolute prohibition on possession of firearms of any sort by anyone except police and military, of course.
Just like in Schindler’s List.
2
posted on
08/12/2016 10:48:10 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: PROCON
Looks like my garage before that tragic flood which washed everything into the river.
3
posted on
08/12/2016 10:48:33 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Common Sense, Trump and Pence. More of the same, Clinton and Kaine.)
To: PROCON
Agree. And don’t ever expect an honest answer to the question. Their goal is couched in the usual marketing phrases like “common sense,” “gun safety,” “reducing gun violence.” That last one is curious in that it isn’t “eliminating” gun violence. Implicitly, they expect an acceptable amount of gun violence from the government following confiscation. But to them, that’s a good thing.
4
posted on
08/12/2016 10:51:19 AM PDT
by
DPMD
(o)
To: PROCON
I've asked that question myself. I get one consistent answer: total banishment in this country and everywhere in the world. Like socialism, there can be no escape for anyone or everyone is in peril.
It does little good to remind them that there was plenty of bloodshed before firearms came around - Genghis Khan comes to mind. It doesn't do any good because it isn't a position they've reached by reason and they're not going to be reasoned out of it.
To: PROCON
What they want is a 100% ban and door-to-door confiscation.
At gunpoint.
6
posted on
08/12/2016 10:52:54 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
To: PROCON
I wonder how they’re going to enforce it.
7
posted on
08/12/2016 10:59:52 AM PDT
by
SkyDancer
("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
To: NorthMountain
8
posted on
08/12/2016 11:04:58 AM PDT
by
PROCON
("Lock Her Up! Lock Her Up! Lock Her Up!")
To: SkyDancer
With guns, of course.
As usual, they assume they’ll be in charge and duly exempt themselves.
9
posted on
08/12/2016 11:09:14 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
To: PROCON
The self-righteous, ignorant responses from our friends "down under" would be amusing if they weren't so pathetic.
Hildebeeste wants to disarm us. There's just no two ways about it.
We cannot permit this to happen.
10
posted on
08/12/2016 11:09:39 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
To: EQAndyBuzz
Being a member of the Gun of the Month Club does have its disadvantages, chief of which is its ability to drive one out of one’s own home through gun proliferation. Sadly, there really is no cure.
To: PROCON
The liberal vision is not one of a gun free society. They never say that but leave it to be implied. The reality is theyre only interested in taking your guns. Theyll keep theirs. Liberals understand guns are necessary to keep the general populace in line and to cull those groups they view as ‘’defective’.
12
posted on
08/12/2016 11:11:57 AM PDT
by
556x45
To: PROCON
13
posted on
08/12/2016 11:12:31 AM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(Don't argue with a Liberal. Ask him simple questions and listen to him stutter)
To: SkyDancer
How? We’ve gotten some previews: LE and military. Those are the groups liberals will use to enforce their plans. Both LE and military seem happy to help.
14
posted on
08/12/2016 11:13:51 AM PDT
by
556x45
To: PROCON
15
posted on
08/12/2016 11:14:33 AM PDT
by
Fido969
(Maybe I';ve been posting for the last 10 years, and rather than spew cr@p you could look up my posts)
To: PROCON
The goal is to totally disarm the citizens.
“shall not be infringed” is very clear language.
There are far too many infringements already.
16
posted on
08/12/2016 11:15:20 AM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
To: PROCON
How much gun control would be enough?I ask myself that all the time.
17
posted on
08/12/2016 11:15:55 AM PDT
by
showme_the_Glory
((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
To: PROCON
RE “Question for gun control advocates: ...”
Answer for Gun Control Advocates:
GFyourselves. Molon Labe.
18
posted on
08/12/2016 11:19:00 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: Lurkinanloomin
They want only the criminals be armed.
19
posted on
08/12/2016 11:19:42 AM PDT
by
CMailBag
To: Fido969
Guns being crushed ...
By government employees, wearing government uniforms, and carrying government guns.
Leftists want to hold a monopoly on the use of lethal force, so they can force YOU to do their bidding.
20
posted on
08/12/2016 11:22:17 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
