Posted on 07/25/2016 7:44:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
During an interview with NBCs Richard Engel, Julian Assange said that there is no proof whatsoever that Russian intelligence sources are responsible for hacking thousands of Democratic National Committee emails. The emails were posted by WikiLeaks over the weekend. The FBI is investigating the hack. Three cybersecurity experts told the DNC that the emails were hacked by Russian intelligence.
There is no proof of that whatsoever. We have not disclosed our source, and of course, this is a diversion thats being pushed by the Hillary Clinton campaign. Thats a meta-story. The real story is what these emails contain and they show collusion. The very top of the Democratic party, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, is now being forced to resign,Assange said during the interview.
And other people from the party, which is meant to be neutral, subverting the process in order to make sure Hillary Clinton won the campaign, he added.
Assange is the editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, an organization which was founded in 2006. The DNC has come under fire after thousands of emails were released over the weekend that appear to show a concerted effort by DNC officials to undermine Bernie Sanders campaign in order to get Hillary Clinton elected. In a statement this afternoon, the DNC apologized for the inexcusable remarks made over email....
(Excerpt) Read more at lawnewz.com ...
Three experts? Manny, Moe, and Jack should stick to auto parts. And, tire bargains. No electronic devices other than GPS and stereos.
So, the very same country that she sold our uranium to, is not responsible for hacking the DNC email system. They own here lock, stock and barrel with the gigantor donation to their foundation, etc. They don’t need to hack anything.
It was the film maker.
For posterity, I hope history eventually gives the credit due to whomever is responsible. For today, I am just happy that the truth of these jacobins is getting out. The enemy within is within the Democrat party. Mostly.
bookmark
Hillary won’t be allowed into the countries of Russia, Egypt, Syria and Libya. They do love her in Bosnia though.
Watch the Clinton Cash documentary on youtube. Putin in effect paid off the Clintons thru the Klinton Krime Koalition (CGI) to get mineral rights thru a now Russian owned Canadian company to a large percentage of the uranium reserves in the US. They're good buddies.
Julian Assange resides at the Ecuadoran Embassy in London, as a matter of legal necessity and Ecuadoran generosity.
London being in the UK, I'm sure the video surveillance of the embassy is more than sufficient to record all physical visitors. And the UK is one of the Five Eyes. You don't want them to see you going to visit Julian, do you?
The proper way to submit documents to WikiLeaks is through this link. Someone should ask Eddie in Moscow if that link is secure.
He was in the DNC audience for Michelle Obama’s speech, at least. That’s the only one I have watched so far (merely by accident), and he was there cheering and yucking it up. He didn’t look visibly unhealthy, although certainly aged beyond his 70 yrs.
The same three typewriter mavens unearthed when Rathergate broke...
"No, you gotta make it look just like a nested glyph, you knucklehead."
Germany has no military that can compete with Russia. NATO in eastern Europe can’t seriously compete with Russia. A couple of brigades??? Putin is laughing at us. Anyway, we certianly don’t need any problems with Russia. Trump will be much better than Shrillary at foreign policy, despite her boast of “experience.”
I agree. If Russia decided to roll, there’s no way NATO could defend any country that borders Russia. Our supply lines would be hundreds of miles away from any “front”; for Russia, it’d be just outside their back door. By the time we positioned, any invasion would be over and done. All NATO can do is try to hold the line around, say, France and England. Conventional war, with men lined up shooting at each others tanks, won’t be how Russia will conduct itself, if their actions in Syria are any indication.
I don’t understand why the sudden push for NATO to publically declare Russia public enemy number one. We’ve pretty much operated on that unspoken premise for 50 years now, so what changed?
the way they mix the verbs and nouns, they are trying to imply that the FBI thinks Russia did it...
But the truth is the FBI is investigating the assertions being made by Hillary’s RICO organization that the RUSSIANS did it made by operatives who are phony “security experts” paid and employed by Hillary and the democrats... to try and get the focus OFF of Hillary and her ongoing and unresolved “SERVER DATA SECURITY” issues.
Weasel words and pseudo “professional” consultant accusations to cover her traitorous ass. If the CIA, FBI, NSA and/or DIA had professionals working on this, they would NOT be leaking out their suspicions publicly. PERIOD.
the Russians are WHITE PEOPLE.
Russians are Slavic by origin and therefore Caucasian in terms of race. Mostly white, and Caucasian and specifically NOT black. Not that there are no black Russians by nationality,but the vast majority of Russian people are clearly whites.
They are also Orthodox Christian.
White Christians are the targets of hate for the racists in the BLM and democratic party today. THAT is why they might have a tendency to blame whitey over there... even if it is on a different continent.
It was the video.
A Democrat with a conscious of all the Rat shenanigans, talk about finding a needle in the hay stack.
I’d believe him over the FBI and any talking head on TV.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.