Posted on 07/11/2016 9:47:39 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
AKRON, Ohio — The Republican Party once chose a presidential nominee who was successful in business but had never held political office. Who went from being a Democrat to a Republican, but was a maverick in his new party. He would often speak off the cuff, was not much of a churchgoer, had what one historian called “a magnetic personality” and was not always faithful as a husband.
He was definitely a dark horse when he began his campaign against veteran candidates but won the GOP nomination in defiance of the political establishment, with what one observer called “a tendency to make his own decisions in his own good way.”
He wasn’t Donald Trump.
He was Wendell Willkie, a former Akron resident who became the Republican nominee in 1940, challenging Franklin D. Roosevelt’s bid for a third term. Willkie lost, was swiftly rejected by his party when he ran again four years later, and died of a heart attack late in 1944.
To many he is barely remembered, if at all. But he did better than any other candidate had against FDR. Historians such as Charles Peters, in his book Five Days in Philadelphia, have praised Willkie for an internationalist perspective in contrast with other Republican candidates’ isolationism. Even as Willkie was running against FDR, Peters said he “gave Roosevelt essential support on issues like the draft and Lend-Lease,” helping to save embattled England and prepare America for war.
Comparisons of Willkie to Trump are not perfect. Trump is a more abrasive speaker, for one thing. And while Trump highlights his luxury-laden life, a close friend of Willkie said he was “no big spender.”
But both men could stir things up. Much the way Trump astounded those who at first thought his campaign ludicrous, author Henry O. Evjen said “no one had given (Willkie) a ghost of a chance” until just before the 1940 convention.
In the introduction to a collection of Willkie essays, historian James H. Madison said, “At a time when Republicans were thought of as stodgy, stiff and narrow-minded, Willkie burst on the scene with a charisma and appeal unmatched in his party since the days of Theodore Roosevelt. His plain, direct manner in speech and dress touched a chord with millions of Americans.”
He was a natural performer, whether delighting audiences as a guest on a radio quiz show (think of it as “reality radio”) or playing Abraham Lincoln in an Akron pageant.
Like Trump, Willkie understood the importance of personal image to politicking. His Indiana upbringing prompted easy media references to him as a “bucolic hayseed,” said essayist George T. Blakey; in fact, Willkie spent most of his life in urban settings, including Akron. Willkie owned farms only as investments, and made his fortune as a business magnate.
But he went along with the “rural myth” because it worked politically, Blakey said. Such a life was still real to many Americans in 1940, and those who had moved to cities nonetheless felt nostalgic for rural life.
Willkie began shaping himself in Akron, apparently with help from a local media baron. While he was at times said to have had no political experience when he ran for president, that meant only that he had not held an office. An editorial praising him as he left Akron for a New York City law firm declared him “prominent in political affairs.” He was a delegate to the Democratic convention in 1924. The following year he battled the Ku Klux Klan over control of the local school board; he had also been part of opposition to the Klan at the 1924 convention.
Of course, Willkie had enemies. Rock-ribbed Republicans disliked many of his stances. In 1943, a former Akron mayor, Republican C. Nelson Sparks, wrote a nasty broadside recalling Willkie’s defenses of a power company in personal injury lawsuits, Sparks noted that Willkie had used his legal talents to prevent “people who lost their eyes, arms or legs” from being compensated by “his employing corporation.”
Trump’s professional practices have also been questioned. But he has become a political sensation. Willkie was one, too, years before Trump was even born.
Franklin did Santa Claus Government and Hillary wants to give college and other things for free as well.
Until we are a third world broke joke the Democrats will keep this up.
Nor accurate or relevant.
Willkie basically was put on the ticket to keep the isolationists off. Even then, more than a year before Pearl Harbor, it was becoming obvious that the US one way or another was going to become involved in what was shaping up as a world war.
More attempts to spread irrelevant slime on Trump.
Let them keep thinking Wenell Wilkie and we’ll ram Trump so far up their butts they’ll holler for mercy. Screw them.
I was wondering when this analogy would come up.
If BHO were running for a third term, this would be a better analogy; in that case, Trump would be the candidate who would have come closest to toppling Obama, but would fail. Since Trump is running, not against the reincarnation of FDR, but the reincarnation of Eleanor, he should have a much better chance of success.
It might also be noted that comparisons of HRC to FDR are rather faint.
Well, their both hid medical conditions.
I believe he was the last candidate for president who had the endorsement of Ayn Rand.
Feel free to correct me.
LMAO.
Nicely done!
I’m waiting for the article comparing Hillary Clinton to Ma Barker.
Wilkie was the out-spoken “One Worlder,” so the comparison is anything but apt.
Everyone who voted against Wendell Willkie will vote for Hillary! We know this because they are mostly dead, and the dead always vote Democrat!
challenging Franklin D. Roosevelt’s bid for a third term....
Rats crave power above all else. FDR. Term limited by the Grime Reaper. If he had been your enough, he would have finished his 4th term, a 5th, 6th... Our very own Augustus.
Willkie’s running mate, Charles McNary, also died before the term they were running for was up...so if they had won, the country would have had an Acting President for the last few months (or maybe he would have been regarded as President—Speaker of the House? or Secretary of State? I don’t remember what the line of succession was in 1944).
Might have been a wiser choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.