Posted on 04/15/2016 9:33:33 AM PDT by MichCapCon
A Grand Rapids doctor generated national headlines with his study that claimed motorcyclist head injuries and deaths have increased sharply since the state repealed a mandatory helmet law in 2012.
Dr. Carlos Rodriguez, the author of the study, said that he noticed a spike in injuries and deaths while working in the trauma unit at Spectrum Health Hospital.
"Injuries soar after Michigan stops requiring motorcycle helmets," is what the Reuters news service said in a headline.
But statistics compiled by the Michigan State Police don’t support a claim of a large increase in motorcycle-related injuries or deaths since the helmet law was lifted.
“We are reporting what we are finding (at Spectrum Health Hospital)," Rodriguez said. "That's the only thing we can report."
His study looked at 345 individuals treated at the West Michigan hospital for motorcycle crashes during the months of April through October during the years 2011 through 2014. The helmet law was repealed in April 2012.
The state police data on motorcycle accident deaths and injuries don't show an increase in the first two years after the helmet law was lifted.
In 2012, 129 people were killed in Michigan motorcycle accidents and 2,870 injured. Those numbers dropped to 128 and 2,497 respectively in 2013. In 2014, the most recent year for which data is available, 107 people were killed and 2,309 injured.
Between 2005 to 2011, while the helmet mandate was still in effect, an average of 114.2 people were killed each year in Michigan motorcycle accidents and 2,757.6 injured. The state police data shows no clear trend.
Sierra Medrano, a spokeswoman for the Michigan State Police, said all traffic crashes are reported to the state police.
"By law, all law enforcement agencies are required to submit qualifying crash reports (reports made using the UD-10 State of Michigan Traffic Crash Report) to the MSP," Medrano said in an email. "The UD-10 Traffic Crash Report Instruction Manual provides law enforcement officers with instructions on what crashes [to report] and how to record them correctly."
I’m 53 and I drive very defensively these days. I assume everyone is drunk and/or texting, your husband probably does the same.
I noticed that people wearing helmets were more likely to take chances
A long ago a friend of mine was run over by a school bus. It hit him and the rear wheels ran over his hips. The news said he wasn’t wearing a helmet. The bus driver showed up in court wearing a neck brace!
My son is an avid cyclist (i.e., bicycle, not motorcycle). One day he was out riding, hit a bump, and was pitched headfirst over the handlebars. He landed on the top of his helmet. The helmet was ruined. He came through without any injury.
I always wear a helmet when I'm riding my bicycle. Had a few spills, but no broken bones and especially no head injuries.
The article deals with injury rate before mandatory helmet law and after repeal of that law.
Rate went DOWN when helmets were not required.
“”Rate went DOWN when helmets were not required.”
True. But the article didn’t indicate if helmets were worn or not in the accidents. “
True again. What the soft message of the article really is: laws do not make us safer, individuals doing the right thing and being responsible for their own actions is what makes us safer.
We do not need a nanny state.
Just for the record, I wear a helmet, not because the state tells me to, but because I believe I get some protection from it. You and I should be free to make our own decisions, and we should live with the consequences of those decisions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.