Liberal Judge Who Ruled Obama A Citizen Repeats Same Mistake With Cruz

Constitution Rising.com ^ | April 13, 2016 | Rick Wells

[Gil4]

Speaking of drivel...

Here are the key questions:

1. Was his mother a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth? (Did she ever renounce her citizenship? Difficult to do and highly unlikely)
2. Did she reside in the U.S. for 10 years, including 5 years after the age of 14, prior to his birth? (Is there any dispute about that?)
3. Did he reside in the US for 5 continuous years between the ages of 14 and 28 (to avoid losing his citizenship)? (No doubt about that)
4. Does “national and citizen at birth” = “natural born citizen.” (That’s the only real question.)

Your allegations of bigamy are irrelevant at best, slanderous at worst.

[WhiskeyX]

“1. Was his mother a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth? (Did she ever renounce her citizenship? Difficult to do and highly unlikely)”

Under normal circumstances it would appear most likely Eleanor retained her natural born citizenship, but the currently available public records, news reports, and political aspirations of her foreign born son make the circumstances anything but normal. In the first place Eleanor’s reputation for trustworthiness is largely non-existent. She abandoned her first husband while residing in a foreign nation to have an adulterous affair and/or a bigamist marriage with an unknown man. Following the death of her son in the United Kingdom of Great Britain, she returned to the United States using a U.S. or foreign passport whose records are sealed away from public scrutiny by her son, Ted Cruz. She subsequently engaged in an adulterous affair with a married man, Rafael Cruz, who also happened to be an apparent illegal alien using false identity documents and a political protestor on behalf of the Communist Cuban revolutionary, Fidel Castro. Eleanor then abandoned the United States in the company of the adulterer, Rafael Cruz, to become a Permanent Resident of Canada. To become a Permanent Resident of Canada, Eleanor was required to proclaim her intention to immigrate to Canada. Temporary workers are not eligible to apply for status as a Permanent Canadian Resident. Eleanor committed herself to eventually renouncing her U.S. citizenship the moment she applied for and was approved to immigrate to Canada as a permanent Resident of Canada, whether or not she eventually did become a Canadian citizen. At that point in time Canada did not recognize dual U.S. and Canadian citizenship, so she was definitely committed to a course of action to actually renounce her U.S. citizenship or id in fact renounce her U.S. citizenship. In either case, she was faithless to her U.S. citizenship. She subsequently returned to the United States and has since then faithlessly renounced her Canadian Permanent Resident status and her intention to immigrate to Canada and possibly her and her son’s Canadian citizenship.

“Difficult to do and highly unlikely)”

At that point in time the U.S. Supreme Court decisions making it substantially more difficult to expatriate U.S. citizenship had not yet taken effect and Canada did not at that time recognize dual citizenship. The publicly demonstrated fact of Ted Cruz’s Canadian citizenship by birth n Calgary, Alberta, Canada demonstrates Eleanor had to be either a Canadian citizen or a Permanent Resident of Canada prepared to renounce U.S. citizenship, otherwise Ted Cruz would have been ineligible for the Canadian citizenship we already know he did in fact obtain by birth in Canada.

2. Did she reside in the U.S. for 10 years, including 5 years after the age of 14, prior to his birth? (Is there any dispute about that?)

Yes, she did. What is in question is whether or not she completed her immigration to Canada by becoming a Canadian citizen after spending a presently unknown period of time as a Permanent Canadian Resident.

3. Did he reside in the US for 5 continuous years between the ages of 14 and 28 (to avoid losing his citizenship)? (No doubt about that)

Yes, there is doubt. Although Ted Cruz did in fact reside in the United States during the required ages, what is in doubt is whether he did so as an illegal immigrant and alien Canadian citizen or as a person automatically naturalized at birth as a U.S. citizen. If in fact Eleanor expatriated her U.S. citizenship, then Ted Cruz was an illegal alien residing in Texas and the time residing there did not perfect a claim to U.S. citizenship that did not exist in the first place.

“4. Does “national and citizen at birth” = “natural born citizen.” (That’s the only real question.)”

A child born abroad in the period from 1802 to 1855 with tow U.S. citizen parents were born without any form of U.S. citizenship. Special legislation had to be enacted to naturalize such children to grant them naturalized U.S. citizenship. If a child born abroad with two U.S. citizen parents were in fact born as natural born citizens, then it would have been so regardless of whether it was in 1790, 1813, or 1970; but history demonstrates beyond all possible doubt such children were born without any form of U.S. citizenship, natural born or naturalized, between 1802 and 1855. So, the claim that any child born abroad with two or one U.S. citizen parent is a false myth as observed by the U.S. Supreme Court: United State v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized....”

“Your allegations of bigamy are irrelevant at best, slanderous at worst.”

You are wrong on two counts. First, I am not making the allegations of bigamy. I am accounting for the fact that other people have reported the marriage and divorce records and their dates indicate the kind of overlap in time indicative of a bigamist marriage/s. Second, because this information, right or wrong, is a part of the public record and public discourse; it all must be taken into account when attempting to determine the actual immigrant, citizenship, and eligibility status of a Presidential candidate, Ted Cruz.