Posted on 03/20/2016 9:00:36 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Any day now, signs waved by protest malcontents will read #RadicalIslamistLivesMatter
If there is one thing the 2016 presidential election campaign proves it’s that ‘The Protest’ as the lib-left’s main agent of change is failing.
Fact is anyone can become a ready-for-rabble, pocket-change paid protester. All professional protesters need is a little free time on their hands, a deep disrespect for the property of others, a sign and a loud screeching voice like Hillary’s.
Protesters who turned out to shut down the roads leading to Donald Trump’s rally in Arizona yesterday discovered that they’re up against the biggest protest in American history, the gathering big steam protest called The Donald camp.
Occupation Wall Street (OWS) and #BlackLivesMatter protesters, paid from the George Soros dynasty are no match for zealous Trump protesters who protest for free.
Absolutely correct and THIS ONE is getting more pissed off by the minute!
Even more P.O’ed by the paid agitators than with the GOPe and RInos. And that is saying alot.
Ochlocracy or mob rule is the rule of government by mob or a mass of people,or,the intimidation of legitimate authorities.
Just as disturbing is the MSM and it's twisting of the events for their own agenda. This was done before in the late 1960's.The agitators, their dupes the university students and some academics.
Almost amusing - if it was not so serious, is the media up here in Canada. Day after day, the talking heads and their "stop Trump". When, if Americans had continually pontificated over a forthcoming Canadian election, there would have been cries of outrage.
It is a funny world, from my perspective.
I think mr trump has held back vis a vis Hillary because — he doesn’t want to knock her out of the race before she gets nominated — he wants to run against her (the least - liked D with the most smelly baggage). Trump doesn’t want the D’s to nominate a more viable candidate, imho. Assuming it is Trump vs Hillary it will be very very very entertaining as Trump will not shy from going through - and shredding- all her failures and genuinely- horrid policies. Hillary’s got more baggage than American Airlines
This is true. Not only the egregious - to put it mildly - abuse of seriously sensitive classified material via her server - which we learn of after she has boasted in Hard Choices that she is certainly no babe in the security woods - and not only the equally egregious violation of the Constitution’s strictureby not asking for, and getting, Congressional authorization for each instance of institutions (her marriage/joint checking account with Bill, and the Clinton Foundation, in both of which she was a principal while Secretary of State) receiving emoluments (“honoraria”) or presents (“donations”) from foreign governments. Absent congressional authorization, IMHO for each instance, they were all illegal irrespective of the use the funds were put to. Even had all the money been given to the Red Cross, she would still be getting credit for doing good, with resources to which she did not legitimately have access.
- Article 1 Section 9:
- No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state
In addition to Whitewater, Rose Law Firm Billing Records, and other scandals with which Hillary is directly associated, there is the small question about the hundreds and hundreds of felony counts of illegal access to sensitive FBI files on former white house appointees, 500 of them Republicans, 400 more which were requested in alphabetical order rather than on a need basis, and which were highly suspicious even though the targets were Democrats. The perpetrator of these felonies was Craig Livingstone, and his name became so toxic that the Clinton Administration was unwilling to identify who hired him. And it announced that Livingstone had “been fired” (note the passive voice), unwilling even to admit who had the authority to fire him. The upshot is that everyone in the Clinton WH at the time is legitimately a suspect.
Hillary Clinton is legitimately a suspect. If she did not hire Craig Livingstone, who did?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.