Posted on 02/09/2016 3:21:00 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
good points..
lets remember what the word screw means when talking about something sexual or getting done wrong.. its slang for the F-word and everybody knows it and everybody uses it even people like like Meghan Kelly on the air
the word pussy when used as a noun to describe somebody who weenies out of a situation is used all the time... James Bond must have said it ten times in Goldfinger back in 1964 and nobody gave a whit.. I call my cat pussy puss and vulgarity never enters my mind..
Trump didnt use it to describe another person a woman audience member did,, he started laughing and the crowed asked him what she had said,, so he told them she said he was a pussy laughing as he said it and a few thousand people roared with laughter and applause.. how horrible a man is Trump for having some fun with his people at his rally..
Russia has stepped up its military maneuvers to a level unseen since the height of the Cold War, according to a new report released by NATO Thursday.
Jens Stoltenberg, the alliance's secretary general and author of the report, noted that Moscow has conducted at least 18 large-scale exercises over the past three years, "some of which have involved more than 100,000 troops."
Those exercises included several simulated nuclear attacks against NATO allies and partner nations ..."
Here is a little history of the word pussy. It almost certainly started likening a woman to a pussycat in the 19th century or earlier. The phrase pussyfooting around, which appears around 1900, implied being timid, afraid, like a cat. No sense of woman there.
Pussy was in use in theater circles by the late 1940’s to mean a homosexual male. Interesting how these terms morph from women to homosexual males, much like a faggot. I don’t think Trump hired any homos. Pussycats? Hmmmmm.
He looks like a big Cruzer.
I’m going to post this again, so bare with me.
Ok...I’m listening to F & Fs. And they’re going to have Bush, and Rubio and Trump.
Ok... so Bush comes out first. I’m going to be open minded and pretend like I’m not decided.
Before Bush comes out, they play this shot of Trump saying in his New York drawl, “If this guy weren’t in gov’t no one would hire the guy.”
Bush comes out, and says, “Well, I’m not looking for a job working for Donald Trump.” and he talks about his job as governor.
Ok...he’s doing good.
Then he orders a BIIIIIIIIG breakfast...Ham and eggs etc.
AND DID I SEE THIS? DID ANYONE SEE THIS? HE PULLS OFF THE SIDES OF THE TOAST JUST TO EAT THE MIDDLE????????!!!!!!!!
I mean the guy goes from like scoring 8 9 and 10s only to pull the sides of the toast off, to eat the middle.
libbylu have you conveniently forgotten your ‘time out’ by Jim for using.....ahem.....angry words toward Freepers
You sure sound like Trump was a 2nd choice; oh, that’s right, a soft 2nd choice, very soft.
True for the most part. He has given to others here and there but he takes full credit for that as well. The point you are missing is that Trump wants America to be great again. The rest of the candidates have no such vision.
That I wouldn't know. But he has hired lawyers.
It was something I wish Trump had not repeated but it certainly is something most people think about many candidates.
That word comes to mind every time I see the current occupant of the WH on his bike with his little helmet. Oh honestly I have said it to friends just seeing him anytime.
Trump hired Roy Cohn, so he hired at least one gay lawyer. (Cohn died of AIDS back in the 80’s)
What the heck are you talking about? First of all, Trump has been all over the friggin map on his positions. Second, most of the others have good to excellent visions for undoing the damage caused by the current saboteur-in-chief. Cruz in particular has an excellent vision which he repeatedly spells out.
I want a street fighter in the White House. I want someone who will take my country back.
yeah, someone who isn’t afraid to sic thugs on people who disagree with him. Someone who whips the crowd into a frenzy and god like admiration. Someone who promises much if but don’t offer any clear plans.
Maybe he can get a special squad of men to protect him. They can wear Brownshirts.
Just a formatting suggestion: You should lead with the girly whining and save the hysterical sobbing for your closing paragraph.
It is not a matter of "undoing the damage". There is nothing that can be undone. No future president will get rid of a single department. The federal government will keep growing. The only thing we can do is try to change the culture back to capitalism and be successful and hope the masses come around and embrace that success.
As for the non-Trump candidates, I am glad that Trump is clearing a path for an outsider like Cruz. But none of them including Cruz want us to prosper. Cruz wants us to globalize even more. The problem with that is that Americans can't compete with slave laborers.
Don’t care that he cusses! Don’t care if he calls opponents bad names! Can’t wait for him to cuss & name call the people who are responsible for America’s decline! I will love it as he lashes the cheap labor express and globalists with words that they deserve!
Ahhhh too upset in your political correctness. How cute. If you want a President that isn’t an alpha male then Cruz is your guy I guess. My opinion is that Trump will be able to handle both the domestic issues and the foreign issues well. He’ll install the right people to ensure the job gets done, and done well.
Cruz will be able to get the internal stuff done probably. I have absolutely zero confidence in his immigration policy. He does have handlers and they are calling the shots on that one. He’s dancing around that subject whenever it is brought up. As for foreign policy, I think he’s another Obama and therefore I cannot vote for him. He would make a great Supreme Court Justice. I would prefer that over VP any day of the week. Ultimately he would better serve the USA in the Supreme Court.
Where do you get this crap from? Aren't you the guy who believes that so-called "man-made global warming" is a proven fact?
These anti Trump post are getting tiresome.
The charges listed in the post may be true or not true, but when presented by someone with obvious bias, I do not bother to consider the level of truthfulness or not.
I do this when reading about people I like or don’t like. I discount many of the outrageous claims against the Clintons and Obama. I don’t doubt that both of the Clintons have done many of the things they are accused of, but rather than sticking to facts our side shows a lack of restraint and we become National Enquirer of blogs. Same goes for Obama, he has done many things I believe harmed our nation, which I hope some day he is held accountable for, but to many times he is accused with something based only on someone’s opinion rather than fact. We hurt our argument when this type of post over runs Free Republic.
I am now seeing the same with the “anti Trump” people who are quick to take anything out of context and then proclaim well now they will not support Trump, as if they ever did.
I am sadden that Free Republic is turning in to DU with the petty name calling, the flame wars, and all the hate being shown towards Freepers who disagree with each other.
Polictics is a rough business, but we need to remember at the end of the day, we are all on the same side. We all want the same thing. We can disagree on who best represent our views, but if we poison the well we all lose, and the socialist win by default.
One person’s opinion -
Flame away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.