Fine - by definition, semi-autos are NOT assault weapons.
Yeah, “banning assault weapons” makes the liberal feel good about themselves,
but they have a hard time defining what they mean by “assault weapons”.
One year, a lib-in-law was decrying why “semi-autos” were available to the public, and I asked him to describe how this “semi-auto” that he was lamenting functioned and why that was worth banning.
I’ll give him props, he knew he couldn’t BS through it, so admitted he didn’t know.
After explaining that the scary guns he was referring to functioned no differently than a deer rifle,
he still wanted a “scary gun ban”, but somehow exclude the deer rifle.
I guess if we had an AR-15 “wood edition”, they’d be ok with it.
You’re going to debate the definition of ‘assault rifle’? First debate the meaning of ‘infringe’; then allow the same to voting, abortion, 1st Amendment, etc.
THEN, as their single brain cell collapses...