Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Fine - by definition, semi-autos are NOT assault weapons.


15 posted on 01/25/2016 3:15:01 AM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: broken_arrow1

Yeah, “banning assault weapons” makes the liberal feel good about themselves,

but they have a hard time defining what they mean by “assault weapons”.

One year, a lib-in-law was decrying why “semi-autos” were available to the public, and I asked him to describe how this “semi-auto” that he was lamenting functioned and why that was worth banning.

I’ll give him props, he knew he couldn’t BS through it, so admitted he didn’t know.
After explaining that the scary guns he was referring to functioned no differently than a deer rifle,
he still wanted a “scary gun ban”, but somehow exclude the deer rifle.

I guess if we had an AR-15 “wood edition”, they’d be ok with it.


25 posted on 01/25/2016 7:43:53 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: broken_arrow1

You’re going to debate the definition of ‘assault rifle’? First debate the meaning of ‘infringe’; then allow the same to voting, abortion, 1st Amendment, etc.

THEN, as their single brain cell collapses...


30 posted on 01/25/2016 9:28:02 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson