Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals are letting Iran have nukes, it's important to remember that...
American Irony ^ | 9-2-15 | The Looking Spoon

Posted on 09/02/2015 5:24:32 PM PDT by The Looking Spoon



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; guncontrol; guns; iran; iraniannukes; israel; lebanon; liberals; nuclearweapons; secondamendment; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: The Looking Spoon

I don’t get it..libs are for nukes? At least they are not against them?


21 posted on 09/02/2015 6:49:55 PM PDT by Leep (Cut the crap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

Once Iran - any belligerent country really - has nukes, going to war with them becomes EXTREMELY difficult. That’s why it is (was) so important to prevent Iran from getting nukes in the first place.


22 posted on 09/02/2015 6:55:01 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Trump campaign ad: Trump, in his Apprentice chair, saying "America, you're hired")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Looking Spoon

So then am I to presume the gun control push is over?


23 posted on 09/02/2015 7:00:18 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grcuster
His hatred for America is showing more and more.

I sure wish all the democrat white, black and mexcolon voters could see mullah obama in his muslim robe. They'd be in for a surprise.

24 posted on 09/02/2015 8:39:29 PM PDT by Mr Apple (Watch Out - there may a faggot on the freeway tonight, if you see 'em, run over 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I thought the same thing...


25 posted on 09/03/2015 12:34:22 AM PDT by The Looking Spoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; HerrBlucher

That’s why I intentionally went with “liberals.”


26 posted on 09/03/2015 12:37:20 AM PDT by The Looking Spoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

Yes, to avoid the disaster of going to war with Iran after they get nukes, there has always been the possibility of going to war with them before they actually get to that threshold to prevent them from reaching it - Obama has always claimed the main reason he wanted his super deal was to avoid that “alternative” - but now to induce brain-dead senators like Casey of Pennsylvania to support the deal he is promising that if Iran violates its terms, he will go to war with them immediately to stop them from moving on to nukes - making the agreement, which Iran is already breaking by sending people to Russia to seek missiles for example, meaningless.....


27 posted on 09/03/2015 6:06:19 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson