Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We're Gonna Need a Bigger Stray Voltage: Hillary Now Being Investigated Under the Espionage Act
Ace of Spades HQ ^ | August 28, 2015 | Ace

Posted on 08/29/2015 3:51:01 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

This strikes me as, um, problematic, as all the kids say.

An FBI "A-team" is leading the "extremely serious" investigation into Hillary Clinton's server and the focus includes a provision of the law pertaining to "gathering, transmitting or losing defense information," an intelligence source told Fox News. The section of the Espionage Act is known as 18 US Code 793.

A separate source, who also was not authorized to speak on the record, said the FBI will further determine whether Clinton should have known, based on the quality and detail of the material, that emails passing through her server contained classified information regardless of the markings.

Now you might think that sounds bad for Grandmonster Hillary.

Nah, don't sweat it, says as progressive cretin David Ignatius at the Washington Post, a totally unbiased paper, swearsies.

The Hillary Clinton e-mail 'scandal' that isn't

Splendid! It's not a sneer without sneer quotes.

By David Ignatius Opinion writer August 27 at 8:37 PM Does Hillary Clinton have a serious legal problem because she may have transmitted classified information on her private e-mail server? After talking with a half-dozen knowledgeable lawyers, I think this "scandal" is overstated. Using the server was a self-inflicted wound by Clinton, but it's not something a prosecutor would take to court.

David Petraus disagrees.

"It's common" that people end up using unclassified systems to transmit classified information, said Jeffrey Smith, a former CIA general counsel who’s now a partner at Arnold & Porter, where he often represents defendants suspected of misusing classified information.

Ah, the guy who defends people who mishandle classified information says it's no biggie.

You can read the rest if you enjoy bad writing which is dumb and partisan.

You may wonder, doesn't this deserve a flaming skull?

No. For some news, we note its import by an even more urgent signal than the flaming skull.

Some news is so enormous as to beg -- nay, demand -- a Realness Update:

(VIDEO-AT-LINK-WITH-LANGUAGE-WARNING)


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; emails; espionage; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; jeffreysmith; obama; trainwreck2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Blood of Tyrants
so that foreign governments could hack them in exchange for “donations” to the Clinton “charity”

I don't think the secret documents have anything to do with the reasons that the server(s) were deployed or how they were used. The exposure of secret documents (if it occurred) was an accidental byproduct of the REAL purpose of this complicated, dangerous, and illegal operation.

That real purpose was to conceal from "Obama", Jarrett, and Michelle the size and scope of the illegality embedded in the Clinton Foundation/Global Initiative. I'm quite certain that was a straight-up bribery/money laundering/tax evasion scheme, and if the FBI has THOSE documents, all three of the Clintons are in big trouble.

41 posted on 08/29/2015 5:30:38 PM PDT by Jim Noble (You walk into the room like a camel and then you frown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet

...”Hillary just released a statement within the last week or two stating that she is in good health”....

I can name that tune in one note! LOLOL


42 posted on 08/29/2015 5:33:04 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There are just two questions that need to be asked over and over, until she answers them or is arrested.

1) You say that you only used this email account and that you never handled classified materials via that account. Is that true?

2) Then how did you accomplish your job as Secretary of State if you never were privy to classified materials?


43 posted on 08/29/2015 5:38:40 PM PDT by MS from the OC (Democrat party platform is based on three things - Big, Hate, and Oh shut up...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I don’t think for a minute that there will ever be a real investigation because if they did, they would discover that Hillary purposefully put secret documents on her private server so that foreign governments could hack them in exchange for “donations” to the Clinton “charity”.

How true, how true.....................

44 posted on 08/29/2015 5:44:15 PM PDT by varon (Don't point that finger at me unless you're prepared to have it broken off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

If that is what is necessary to keep her from becoming President-then go for it.


45 posted on 08/29/2015 5:44:35 PM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why would anyone pay millions to hear her speak?

For the IP address of her server of course.

And yes,it was obviously being used as a honey pot for America’s enemies


46 posted on 08/29/2015 5:44:44 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MS from the OC

Good questions.


47 posted on 08/29/2015 6:02:30 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Yep, the Clinton “charity” was set up to enrich the Clintons while allowing wealthy liberals to write the donations off their taxes. And if a little treason was required to get those donations from foreign governments, so what? It’s not like the Justice Department is going to prosecute the Clintons. (spit)


48 posted on 08/29/2015 6:47:35 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
[but there’s nothing in it for him to go against her.]  photo images_zpszahc7ufk.jpg
49 posted on 08/29/2015 7:09:19 PM PDT by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The feds have been investigating her emails for over two years. Nothing has been done. If this is the best we have, we’re doomed.


50 posted on 08/29/2015 7:12:30 PM PDT by bgill ( CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ...
Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.

51 posted on 08/29/2015 8:19:01 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jonty30; All

“It’s a tactic to get her to quit so somebody more viable can run. She will be basically given the choice of continual investigations into all her illegal activities or resign and the investigations go away.

It’s perfectly Stalinism.”

Yes. Exactly what I expect from the Obama administration. Clinton is no an ally, she is a rival. The Obama administration controls the FBI. They are not an independent entity.


52 posted on 08/29/2015 8:20:02 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“I doubt it. Obama may not like her, but there’s nothing in it for him to go against her.”

Except maintain his legacy, maintain an effective third term, and keep a semblance of power.


53 posted on 08/29/2015 8:22:15 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

The feds DID give her weeks to get the hard drive on her server erased... that was a bad sign.


54 posted on 08/29/2015 8:34:45 PM PDT by GOPJ (Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

55 posted on 08/29/2015 9:25:00 PM PDT by seawolf101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Didn’t she refuse to testify because of concussion?


56 posted on 08/30/2015 6:26:38 AM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay

Yes. Karl Rove stated he Hillary had brain damage from that which of course was denied. Anything Hillary states is more than questionable.....she stated out corrupt and only fine tuned her tactics over the years.


57 posted on 08/30/2015 8:17:33 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson