Posted on 07/29/2015 6:39:13 AM PDT by IChing
In case you’re a bit late to the party, there’s a new and important political meme spreading, a game-changing litmus test for fortunes on the Right. Some are still scratching their heads over what it’s all about, this #cuckservative thing. I’m here to help sort it out.
Do you loudly crow about how morally reprehensible it is for anyone to say that Dylann Roof expressed legitimate grievances in his manifesto, but see black men raping white women and murdering whites by the thousands as just sociological effects, about which we should only whisper?
Do you think those who advocate for white interests are a bigger threat to the Republican party image and electoral chances than politicians like Rand Paul and Jeb Bush who abandon whites and pander to minorities in vain, trying to get them to vote GOP?
Do you join Democrats in calling for even more measures to guarantee equal pay for women and men in similar jobs, regardless of employers’ prerogatives or natural circumstances?
Do you think the achievement gaps between races are attributable to failures of our socioeconomic systems and government, not innate differences among races?
Do you preach that most blacks and hispanics are at heart really conservatives, except they just don’t realize it yet?
Do you make sure to distance yourself from any white person who might postulate heresy on racial matters?
I think you’re getting the picture here.
As a good “cuck,” you take pains to argue for more legal immigration into the U.S.(from wherever), even while you feebly object to the ongoing waves of millions of illegals pouring in from the third world.
You’re cautious to explain that people of any and all ethnic nationalities can be expected to become good, loyal Americans, and not alter the essential character of our country, no matter how many millions of them swarm in — so long as they “accept the rule of law” and the Constitution, etc.
You’d sooner denounce and ban the Confederate flag than the rainbow fudgepack-flag which flies at your workplace, because your bourgoise lifestyle, image, and sense of self-worth demands that you maintain your job and polite relationships with whoever. Better that your children be taken camping by Dan Savage than anyone see you as some kind of hateful bigot!
You’re so terrified of being labelled a racist that you’ll eagerly continue to support or at least be quiet about anti-white trends, and angrily throw other whites under the bus if they try to stick up for white interests.
You’ll make sure everyone knows how much you revere Martin Luther King, while you wouldn’t be caught dead praising Jared Taylor.
You’ve been cuckolded by the anti-white elements pervading our politics. You imagine that the invasion and rape of your nation by non-whites is happening under your own altruistic direction, even while you watch in the sick satisfaction of your ethnomasochistic expense, and you get a smug and sanctimonious feeling of superiority when you chastise, censor, and condemn anyone expressing ideas about preserving a white majority and protecting white interests.
You’re repulsed more by white racism than you are by the non-white predators and the perverts who are raping and murdering your wives, sons, and daughters. That makes you a disgusting and pathetic cuckservative. What makes it even worse is that your conventional, play-it-safe mindset helps perpetuate the status quo, instead of pushing for radical change.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkI5FWRSWjo
“I am afraid that there is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don’t want the patient to get well, because as long as the disease holds out they have not only an easy means of making a living, but also an easy medium through which to make themselves prominent before the public.” - Booker T. Washington
America would be much better off if we could get back to the Booker T way of thinking.
Funny, he's not the one who is linking to AmRen and the National Policy Institute.
Opposing white supremacists does not make one a "tool."
You, on the other hand, seem to be linking to the SPLC.
No, not really. Not at all, actually.
From The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, regarding 2005 SAT scores:
In 2005, 153,132 African Americans took the SAT test. They made up 10.4 percent of all SAT test takers. But only 1,132 African-American college-bound students scored 700 or above on the math SAT and only 1,205 scored at least 700 on the verbal SAT. Nationally, more than 100,000 students of all races scored 700 or above on the math SAT and 78,025 students scored 700 or above on the verbal SAT. Thus, in this top-scoring category of all SAT test takers, blacks made up only 1.1 percent of the students scoring 700 or higher on the math test and only 1.5 percent of the students scoring 700 or higher on the verbal SAT.For companies looking for super-smart people, there just aren't enough qualified blacks to satisfy Jesse Jackson or the EEOC...
If we raise the top-scoring threshold to students scoring 750 or above on both the math and verbal SAT — a level equal to the mean score of students entering the nation's most selective colleges such as Harvard, Princeton, and CalTech — we find that in the entire country 244 blacks scored 750 or above on the math SAT and 363 black students scored 750 or above on the verbal portion of the test. Nationwide, 33,841 students scored at least 750 on the math test and 30,479 scored at least 750 on the verbal SAT. Therefore, black students made up 0.7 percent of the test takers who scored 750 or above on the math test and 1.2 percent of all test takers who scored 750 or above on the verbal section.
FR is changing. Just a few years ago, the Mods would have pulled this thread with a “no thanks”.
Many on the right are absolutely fed up with political correctness and cuckservatism, and they are waking up to the fact that demographics are destiny.
Years ago, Trump’s remarks would have lost him all of the support he is enjoying now.
Things do look to be changing, and if so, that’s good.
Yes, I saw that numerous times.
I’m glad it has changed, we need an honest discussion of racial issues somewhere, and there are precious few places where it happens.
Several years ago, I expressed the opinion that Obama was going to set race relations back 100 years. It’s increasingly looking like I was right.
A 700 or higher on the math section is good enough for a scholarship and/or admission to a very selective college, but 500 is the average score. The average engineering major, for example, scores just a little bit above average (in the 500’s) on the SAT math portion. If you don’t believe me, check here:
http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-the-average-sat-score-for-every-college-major-2014-10
IOW, the SAT may be a good measuring tool indicating potential success in college, but it’s not the end-all. Employers don’t care whether you’ve scored high on the SAT. The degree is what matters.
Neither. It's about family. It's about hard work. It's about the decisions we make in life.
Then, if hyenas and orangutans just made better choices they’d have outcomes on par with, say, the Swiss?
???? That question makes no sense whatsoever.
The context of my post in the Twitter thread was "For companies looking for super-smart people".
At MIT, a 750 SAT Math score puts you at just the 25th percentile.
The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study looked at black kids adopted as babies by upper-middle-class white families, with adopting parental IQ averaging 120.
The black kids' IQ scores were measured at the age of 17. The average black IQ is 85. The kids with two black biological parents scored 89. So, even with every possible environmental advantage, the improvement was minimal.
That’s MIT. There are plenty of other colleges. MIT doesn’t have all the high-scoring SAT test-takers.
I personally know of students who scored close to perfect SAT scores and are attending other colleges.
Whenever I see studies like that one, I think, “So what?”
As a conservative, you believe in higher standards and hard work - right?
Conservatism is about individualism - it’s all about the choices you make.
The Left is all about group status.
Why not? You say biology has nothing to do with it, right?
For that matter, why is the product of a horse and a donkey called a mule, and not a horse?
Both the left and cuckservatives deny racial differences, because racists are supposed to be horrible people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.