Posted on 07/18/2015 12:52:55 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
Your “news” is 80 years old. It is historical trivia.
The Duke of Edinburgh’s mother is one of the’Righteous among nations’ for sheltering a Jewish family in Nazi occupied Greece during the war: http://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/righteous/stories/princess_alice.asp
You understand I said he himself was no supporter of NAZIs. His siblings married into it, with enthusiasm.
Let’s be clear on that.
And the “Queen Mum” objected to her daughter marrying Phillip, whom she called “The Hun.”
She did that because of his sibling’s willful associations.
It is not “my” news but historical fact.
If you believe this is trivia, then that is your right.
I am not so dismissive, and for good reason.
I’m relieved to hear you have a good reason for posting historical trivia from a trash tabloid.
LOVE that!!!!
Take your complaint up with the moderators.
Or dispute the facts.
Ad hominem isn’t going to cut it.
What ad hominem? You still haven’t given a reason why this factoid is relevant to anybody except fans of tabloid trash. Stop crying and tell us why this means anything.
No one is “crying” — which is an ad hominem, again.
And if you don’t like the original article (which I did not post) then don’t read it or comment.
You still haven’t refuted the facts or the photos, as they are true.
And also, please point out what is “crying” when one sites facts and avoids ad hominem attacks.
You are unhappy with “factoids” — but you admitted they are facts. So there is progress.
The photos are genuine(not “true”, and my point is, “So What?” Why does this ancient trivia bother you so much? I don’t think you know what “ad hominem” means, and you will never have the power to tell me what to read or to post. You seem to have some screws loose.
Nobody is telling you when and where to post.
And saying someone has a screw loose when they disagree is something that is ad hominem.
You insist on dismissing other’s opinion on an historical topic, which you regard as trivial. Not all of us do, including the original poster.
You are unhappy with some history regarding British royalty. I get it.
You still have not explained why you think this photo is a big deal. I doubt if you can express yourself well enough to do so. There is nothing in this picture that reveals anything that was not already known for 70 years. I couldn’t care less about the royals or any other Brits. Their obsession with WW1 and WW2, and their insistence that they won both wars single-handed annoys me. You annoy me with your refusal to say what you think is important about this whole matter. BFD, bud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.