Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NM: Threats Complicate Defense of Self and Others
Gun Watch ^ | 14 December, 2014 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 12/14/2014 3:03:50 PM PST by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Tijeras_Slim

I remember seeing that sign when I lived in Farmington.


21 posted on 12/14/2014 4:06:33 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (I survived I-35W through Fort Worth in Rush hour! MILE AND MILES OF CONSTRUCTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Good manners and common sense are always valued on Free Republic.

Well, unless you happen to disagree with the War on Drugs, that's a sure way to be called everything from anarchist to druggie, even if you show your reasoning.

22 posted on 12/14/2014 4:25:50 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Long ago, police learned that the same situation can be truthfully testified to in court in two ways. But one of the ways can open the door to unreasonable cross examination casting doubt on your testimony, and the other does not, as long as you do not let your words be twisted by the attorney.

So the police developed a stylized way of testifying, to express the facts, but in such a way that their testimony was unimpeachable.

Similar rules apply to ordinary citizens, but most do not realize it, so their honest testimony is corrupted by the attorney during cross examination, even falsely implicating them in a crime.

This especially applies to the defensive use of guns.

If you are defending yourself against an attacker or home invader, of course you are afraid. It is your dominant, instinctual reaction. So in testimony you can very accurately and reasonably say that you were in fear for your life.

However, in cross examination, attorneys will try to get you to rephrase the truth, parse the truth, admit to any other state of mind, or some other trick to get you to testify differently from the basic truth, that you were in fear for your life.

This is why you must not waver from telling the truth. If they push too hard trying to force you to waver from the truth, you can even directly appeal to the judge, assuming that your attorney is just sitting there like a bump on a log.

“Your honor, my state of mind was that I was in fear for my life. That is my testimony.” This legally means that the question was “asked and answered”, so re-asking the same question is in effect badgering.


23 posted on 12/14/2014 4:50:21 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

reason matters less and less here. if people want to attack you they just ignore the parts they want to ignore and attack you.


24 posted on 12/14/2014 5:35:00 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson