The lead article is delusional. Did you see the word “premillennial” anywhere in this article? It disparages “Millennialists” while never telling you what to call the alternative to it. Amillennialism? Postmillennialism? Preterism? The article does not say.
The article uses the ploy of an anti-millennialist: prove the pretrib “rapture” false, then having gotten you eating out of its hands, subtly give you the idea that the author of this piece’s particular anti-millennial view, whether Amill, Preterist, or Postmill, is your only alternative.
All of which doctrines are even more false than the pretrib rapture dispensationalism thet it is so opposed to.
This “we are your only alternative” is the hook used by the anti-millennialists to entrap so many people.
I have heard both doctrines preached in the pulpit. I have seen church upheaval over these two doctrines. I personally believe that when the Lord returns it’s over period.
That being said my question to those who would be upset with this view would be is it more important to argue doctrine on the end times or to preach the Good News? If you argue the for the former instead of the later I would suggest you are misguided as to priorities as per Christ’s own words. If you are saved either way it goes down you are ready and that is important of all things.