Posted on 07/02/2014 7:20:40 AM PDT by rktman
Can you imagine telling the IRS you don’t need to complete all their forms or provide records to back up your claim for a tax refund? Or saying your company’s assurances that its medical products are safe and effective should satisfy the FDA? Especially if some of your data don’t actually support your claims—or you “can’t find” key data, research and other records, because your hard drive conveniently crashed? But, you tell them, people you paid to review your information said it’s accurate, so there’s no problem.
Do you suppose the government would accept your assurance that there’s “not a smidgen” of corruption, error or doubt—perhaps because 97% of your close colleagues agree with you? Or that your actions affect only a small amount of tax money, or a small number of customers—so the agencies shouldn’t worry?
If you were the Environmental Protection Agency, White House-operated US Global Change Research Program and their participating agencies (NOAA, NASA, NSF, etc.), you’d get away with all of that.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Best story on the EPA junk science and coverup that I have seen. It summarizes how the agency and Obama administration regularly thwart FOIA requests to keep information from scientists who might want to challenge their data, assumptions and conclusions. It also details how the agency cooks the books so that benefits of green energy are exaggerated and costs to industry in jobs and higher consumer electric bills are minimized. These folks are just plain criminal.
Yeah, but it’s just a bunch of “deniers” spreading lies and innuendos about one of the goobermints stellar agencies. /S
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.