Posted on 05/28/2014 9:04:50 AM PDT by LeoMcNeil
Evil murderer Elliot Rodger tried to target women who allegedly wouldn’t engage in sexual relations with him. He managed to murder three men and three women in the process. In order to score cheap political points on Twitter, feminists have created #YesAllWomen. It’s little more than grievance peddling and a vain attempt to turn all men into the next Elliot Rodger. The media of course loves this sort of meaningless Twitter narcissism. They’ve declared it “powerful” and thought provoking. Everything progressives do is “powerful” according to the media. There is little powerful about women whining on Twitter. In fact, if all the 140 character stories are to be believed it’s pretty clear that the weaker sex needs male protection.
(Excerpt) Read more at leomcneil.net ...
# Give every woman a gun!
he murdered 4 men and 2 women... not 3 and 3...
And if you aren’t familiar with this particular hashtag it is meaningless. It wasn’t “save” or “protect” it looks like a lesbian bar hastag to me
Hashtag activism.
Could anything be more pathetic?
Hey Leo, what caused you to excerpt your own blog?
In the 1970's many feminists hated men. In 1975, Susan Brownmiller's book Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape" argued that rape wad not aberrant behavior, but a strategy devised by men to maintain their control over women: that, in essence, all men were guilty of rape, all women victims of rape. Every rape, Brownmiller argued, was an act not of sexual desire but of violent aggression against women; and conversely, every act of violence against women by men was rape. All acts of violence/rape, that is,were political acts encouraged by the male (or patriarchal) system as a means of oppressing women,. The oppression of women, than, is and act of continuing rape, and ongoing crime of violence against women.
In Kalifornistan, it can be difficult to tell...
The great equalizer...
You couldn’t even get the facts straight about the victims? That doesn’t look too good.
all women?...so what your point...
Because guess what...
ALL MEN have been used and then rejected by women...
it's common knowledge... this writer did not do the homework...
I own that book it is quite a read, of all the lesbian and feminist homes that I have been in, I have never seen a larger collection of feminist literature than my own.
Hey, Free Republic is his own personal blog pimping space. This isn't something he does occasionally - it's what he ALWAYS does.
4 males and 2 females.
But...
Was is 2 CIS Males, 2 Gender Questioning Males, 1 CIS Female, and 1 Gender Nuetral Biofemale?
Or was it 1 CisGender Man, 2 GenderFluid Males, 1 BiGender Male, 1 Gender Varient Female, and 1 Trans Person?
In Kali, simple concepts like Genetics have frequently taken a back seat to “feelings”.
And yes, I’m taking a deliberate and sarcastic shot at Leftist idiocy. If that isn’t blindingly obvious by now...
I vote to give women suffrage and equal rights so they no longer have to depend on patronage for anything and can do whatever any other able bodied man/person can dor themselves
I wanted to treat the sexes equally which is why I said it was 3 and 3. I wouldn’t want to be accused of discrimination!
yes—i am just tired of bad, lazy journalism... hard to take seriously...
Understandable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.