Report claims Eric Holder approved drone strike against Bundy ranch

The Examiner ^ | April 26, 2014 | Joe Newby

[2ndDivisionVet]

On Friday, John Jacob Schmidt of Radio Free Redoubt said that according to Stewart Rhodes, founder of Oath Keepers, Attorney General Eric Holder has approved drone strikes against the Bundy ranch to take place some time in the next 48 hours. According to Schmidt, the information came from a source Oath Keepers has within the Department of Defense.

That source, according to the report, allegedly said Attorney General Eric Holder authorized what is known as a "hot drone strike" against the ranch. Such a strike, he added would effectively kill everyone at the ranch.

Schmidt said that as far as he could determine, there has been no attempt to follow through with the alleged threat. He also expressed hope that a planned strike against Americans on U.S. soil could be averted....

[2ndDivisionVet]

Go grab a big grain of salt.

[x1stcav]

False flag alert.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The only reason that would happen is because Ubama has decided it is time to declare martial law, and he wants an excuse.

[combat_boots]

That’s it, Guy. MAKE THEM MARTYRS against unjust laws and a corrupt government.

[1rudeboy]

We use the term "false flag" so much, it's becoming meaningless. So assume Holder approved a drone strike . . . who was he planning on blaming the operation on?

[Jack Hydrazine]

In the past I would have said something like that is just a bunch of bunk, but the Chicago crowd is running things in the District of Criminals these days.

[Popman]

Oh’ please....

Obama and Holder are not that stupid...

I’m sure they wet their panties thinking about it...though. ..

[G Larry]

No such authority!

[Starboard]

You may be right. But then again consider Fast and Furious. That was unthinkable too.

[EQAndyBuzz]

I call BS.

[mark3681]

Leslie Paul - “Information may, or may not, be valid”...

Well, there ya go.
Although it wouldn’t surprise me one bit. We’ll just have to keep an ear, and an eye, on this one.

[Popman]

——No such authority!——

Humm....like that matters to these thugs....

The only reason they wouldn’t drone attack the Bundy ranch is the poltical cost is too high...

[Paladin2]

[SaxxonWoods]

“Holder authorized what is known as a “hot drone strike” against the ranch. Such a strike, he added would effectively kill everyone at the ranch.”

How does one ineffectively kill people?

This article is a primer on how to look stupid in public.

Drone strike my ass.

[Pontiac]

If Holder actually did something like this, I think even the Democrats in Congress would call for impeachment.

[Paladin2]

"who was he planning on blaming the operation on? "

W and the Tea Party and the Kochs.

[OldNavyVet]

Obama and Holder are not that stupid...

They are.

We ain't seen nothing yet.

[RIghtwardHo]

More like a salt mine.

Whenever you hear “someone says”, “people say” etc then time to pretty much ignore it.

[chevydude26]

Man they really think people are that gullible...

[Smokin' Joe]

I half expected to hear about the unfortunate "gas explosion" on the ranch, subsequently 'thoroughly investigated' by the BATFE, who would announce that there is "no evidence which exists" to support any of the 'wild internet conspiracy theory rumors' it was a missile strike from a drone or other source.

So I won't discount the possibility that this might be true.

After all, Janet Reno okayed pumping a building full of Methylene Chloride and CS powder when it was inhabited by men, women, and children (down to infants), and then haad the place shot with pyrotechnic teargas rounds while tanks were crushing the exits. (Waco).

Guess who was deputy AG under Reno?

(Eric Holder)