Posted on 04/22/2014 11:47:52 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
No doubt inspired in part by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who called supporters of the Bundy ranch "domestic terrorists," a number of liberals on Twitter expressed their desire to see the ranch and its supporters killed by drone strikes, Paul Joseph Watson reported at Infowars Monday. Such a raid would, of course, kill innocent children as well as men and women, but it seems that didn't matter to those demanding the deadly raid.
"If ever there was a time for a drone strike, I'd say Bundy's self-appointed militia should've been turned into paste on the prairie," one person said.
"If you really want to make me purr, show me gun cam footage of the Bundy ranch drone strike," another person added. Many others expressed the same sentiment....
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
The libs didn’t forget, they never learned that fact in the first place. Useful idiots.
What else they don’t comprehend is that when the bullets start flying, the situation could get out of control quickly. They have no idea of what they are wishing for.
Maybe someone in the BLM got religion and figured out that this was not going to be another Waco where they won. There are a whole lot more people watching what is going on in Nevada than were watching Waco.
Welcome America to the New Socialist Republic!
Class assignment for today!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes
The Bundy debacle revolved around jurisdiction - who is the steward of the land. The blm claimed jurisdiction and rationalized that they had the right to remove humans and human activities (in this case raising cattle) because of allegedly endangered tortoises.
I’ve personally witnessed Spotted Owls - another “endangered species” in downtown Olympia, Washington state’s capitol. What would be ironically humorous would be if these self-same idgits decided that the residents of that metropolis had to vacate the premises in order to “protect” the owls. You notice how it is only the rural areas that are affected by the heavy hand of gubmint?
Liberals hate us nasty rightwingers for our guns (actually we love the protection of our liberty that having guns makes possible, but never mind).
So.....if liberals want the govags to start massacreing us, don’t they realize that respect for the law enforcers goes only as far as the belief that said enforcers are acting in accordance with the law?
Once govag law enforcers are seen as acting lawlessly, then all bets are off & it’s Katy bar the door when there is no monopoly on who has guns.
-PJ
Ping!
I think you’d be surprised how many of them are 24, 34, 44, 54 and 64 year olds, though the mom & pizza bite thing might ring true in many instances...
These sick turds have absolutely no idea of the sh1tstorm that would be unleashed if this was done.
I believe that the federal thugs have made a serious tactical error in this attack on Bundy. They pushed it just a little too far and have made it known just how far their various private armies are willing to go.
A lot of people out there realize that it was not common sense or good judgement that stopped them from shooting unarmed AMERICANS. It was a film maker and the sudden realization that A) the media wouldn’t be able to spin them out of a mass slaughter this time, and B) some of them also realized that behind these unarmed victims they *wanted to shoot* were armed citizens that were not going to let them walk away from mass MURDER this time.
It looks a lot different to these over armed thugs when there are victims that will shoot back. These (illegal and unconstitutional) private armies of the various federal agencies are cowardly bullies. Put them in a real war like our real military personnel have to face and they’d crap themselves. They get all suited up like it’s some damn paintball game and figure they will be beating up on unarmed civilians. If they actually push Americans in to defending themselves I suspect that it will not be at all the cakewalk they expect.
The real lesson from this “incident”? If Americans let the government disarm them now, I guarantee the internment camps will no longer be right wing paranoia. The only reason they haven’t declared “war” on the citizenry is because we still have our guns.
I think that there are a lot of FReepers wishing for the same thing, who don't comprehend this either.
The last Civil War depopulated the country by somewhere between 2 and 5 percent. That was without modern weaponry, and a population that was a whole lot more self-sufficient. I'd shudder to think of what modern warfare would look like, on the same scale. 2-5 percent casualties would overwhelm our (already troubled) medical system, and frankly, I think that would just be a warm-up.
There comes a time when violence is necessary and inevitable, however, CW II is an event that I look forward to with trepidation, not enthusiasm.
Most of those leftards probably also have ‘coexist’ stickers on their cars.
Less like 1861 than like 1776, I think. The feds, some law enforcement some military and some politicians playing the role of the King's oppressors. Some libs playing the part of the Tory informers, very few volunteering for armed service for the regime, others hiding and trying to stay out of the line of fire. As for our side, no George Washington, but a bunch of quality lower level leaders. A lot of us holed up in a defensive posture and setting occasional ambushes; a few of us actively hunting the enemy leadership.
I agree with your take; not a pleasant thought or a cause for celebration.
Any vehicle with that sticker occupied by an adult male/males, but no women or children, should be a priority target. They've chosen their side.
Well, well, well. The little pussies want someone else to kill someone with a drone. Typical cowards.
Perhaps they imagine themselves as descendants of John Brown, who wanted to cause a slave rebellion resulting in the savage butchery of men, women and children.
Except John Brown at least had the modicum of righteousness to end slavery. Today’s Democrats want to create Red Khmer style butchery to *restore* slavery.
Spiritually, they are more descended from the fictional character of Calvin Candie. Pretentious, sadistic, corrupt, and hypocritical.
You have exactly the right of it. They think they will use the muzzies then get rid of them. I think the muzzies will get them in the end.
-PJ
Yep. They aren't really against the death penalty at all. They just want it to be used only on certain types of people (ie; Constitutionalists, the unborn, anyone who is an impediment to their vision of "Utopia"), largely without any due process of law whatsoever. The ultimate in hypocrisy...
the infowarrior
However, I'm thinking of the, erm, "urban opportunists". I'd think that, in either of our scenarios, the rioting on a national scale would make the Rodney King Riots look like a Sunday School picnic. And social breakdown, particularly in the urban areas, would quickly follow. Rural areas, not so much. And suburbs would likely be somewhere in between, depending on their makeup.
That's just my $0.02.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.