If a special prosecutor investigates Onaka and others in Hawaii government (which all locals know is corrupt) and obtains evidence of fraud, then two things happen:
1. The Obama supporting press attacks the character of the Special Prosecutor and attempts to discount his evidence,
2. Voters see through the charade of Obama and his paid press support and elect enough members of Congress to swing power to the GOP.
I don’t see a super majority as necessary. If Onaka is indicted and is made to confess, enough dems will stand down to allow Obama to be exposed.
The key is to reveal the corruption in the Hawaii government.
I wish the revelation of corruption would be sufficient to motivate voters to toss those responsible out of office.
But in practice it hasn’t.
The trend is using “messaging” and huge detailed databases to identify and motivate “low information” voters to outnumber those who pay more attention to the actions of public officials. There is big money behind this tactic, much of it from individuals and groups who stand to benefit from favorable governmental policy rulings and others who just get outright giveaways.