Posted on 03/15/2013 3:51:54 PM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Lt. Mike Zullo, lead investigator of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County Sheriff Department's Cold Case Posse has been attending CPAC. Carl Gallops has been attending CPAC with Lt. Zullo and has reported what has transpired with their meetings with many high official lawmakers on Capitol Hill about Barack Obama's ineligibility to be President of the United States. At the meetings, lawmakers and VIP's were overwhelmed (shocked) at the evidence they were presented with that proves Obama's birth documents are fraudulent. Listen to the video for their report.
You may try notifying Jim, FR owner.
Texas Fossil,
See #80 by hotlanta mike, they mention “scandal bigger than Watergate”.
Your post mentioned “treason”.
Those two things together are ‘the bigger picture’ than which guy was the dad.
What we have now is, the cover-up and subsequent compounding of crimes.
Lying (to get student aid possibly) is one thing, obstruction of justice and identity theft are another, are currently going on, and are actionable.
Impeach for high crimes and misdemeanors!
If a congressional committee issues a subpoena for the BC, the crap hits the fan. Democrats will squeal like pigs. I want to see our first Muslim president seeking asylum. This makes Watergate look like child’s play.
Hi Mike. Many thanks for posting this. Let us all pray that courage and integrity imbue those who’ve been notified. That’s really all that’s needed, yes?
Thanks bitt.
The simple fact that someone who has fabricated (including committing criminal forgery and fraud)his identity has assumed the highest public office in the land and is aided and abetted by a corrupt US Attorney General and state run media should concern every citizen.
There are two professional organizations whose members are regularly qualified as expert witnesses by judges to testify in court: The American Board of Forensic Document Examiners and The American Society of Questioned Document Examiners.
“There are two professional organizations whose members are regularly qualified as expert witnesses by judges to testify in court: The American Board of Forensic Document Examiners and The American Society of Questioned Document Examiners.”
But do they do forensics on computer images of a document like the PDF image of Obama’s birth certificate on the White House server?
I love that man, with a nice platonic love.
That’s not being a realist, that’s called being a defeatist. Just because a crime wasn’t prosecuted yet, doesn’t mean ollie ollie in free for the criminalS. More than one need their just rewards shoved in their faces, fast and hard.
“But do they do forensics on computer images of a document like the PDF image of Obama’s birth certificate on the White House server?”
There is nor reason to examine the pdf. There is the AP copy which is a higher resolution image than the pdf. It could not have been made by the pdf copy (which is a lower resolution image). This means that there is an original document or computer file from which the pdf and the AP copies were created. That document or file has never been examined.
Then there are the photographs taken by Savanah Guthrie. Are they of the document that was used to create the pdf and AP copies? That paper document has never been examined.
BTW, all three of these images (AP, pdf, photos) contain the same vital statisitcs information.
Also, someone had to accompany Obama from Indonesia to Hawaii in 1970 or 1971. He claims he travelled ‘alone’ in his book. Highly unlikely - a 10 year child, alone, on a multi-hop international trip in 1970 or 1971? Come on. He did not travel with his mother. Her passport expired in 1970 and this was documented when she arrived in the US in October of 1971. So who would have had ‘interest’ in retrieving a young Obama from Indonesia?
The natural birth father. The problem would have been when they arrive at immigration. A known communist with a child that may be his biologically, but is not his in any legal form show up at immigrations. What happens?
What ever happened probably got cleaned up in December of 1971. The ‘grand family reunion’. When done Obama goes back Kenya to live another decade before being offed. Stanely Ann goes back to Indonesia - her new country with her husband. And Obama is left in Hawaii. Who are the legal guardians? Where is that documented?
Would that there ‘were’ a real paper document, yes?
To every thing, spin, spin, spin
There is a season, spin, spin, spin
And a time to every purpose under heaven ........
4Zoltan. you state: “BTW, all three of these images (AP, pdf, photos) contain the same vital statisitcs information.”
So out of those images, which one do you think the forensic laboratory looked at and signed off as a 100% forgery as Zullo stated?
Zullo is not high on Zolt’s credibility meter. ‘Bill’ Clinton would have to declare the .doc a forgery, before Zolt got the leg-tingle-of-truth sensation.
The trouble with all these purported dates, names and ‘facts’ is they were all manufactured for the “Obama Narrative’. Fools that created it were too impressed with the tale they spun to anticipate the questions that would arise - and the level of scrutiny paid to unsupportable statements. Meanwhile, America has wasted five to six years chasing down details that exist only in the imaginations of the “Obama Narrative” creators.
They will overload the free-boat, and it will collapse. Then they will die, And so will any of us who is badly prepared for it.
Yes, but any forensic document examiner worth his or her salt is going to want to compare the computer generated PDF image to the original, vault copy document.
In court, this is essential because the state of Hawaii has consistently maintained that the data on the original matches the data on the whitehouse.gov image. The administration could have posted a drawing of a birth certificate by Malia Obama, if the data s the same as on the original, there is no crime.
Under Hawaii law, a judge’s court order would be necessary to release the original and even that is questionable since the letter of the law says that a court order can force the release of a “COPY” of the original for inspection. (Hawaii Revised Statute 338-18 (b) (9).
Your entitled to your opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.