Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court to conference on Obama eligibility today
Coach is Right ^ | 2/15/13 | Suzanne Eovaldi

Posted on 02/15/2013 9:09:12 AM PST by Oldpuppymax

Today, February 15, 2013, Attorney Orly Taitz brings her request to move the Obama eligibility challenge from conference to the oral hearing stage at the US Supreme Court. She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy who denied her petition originally. “But I resubmitted to Justice Roberts, and he sent it to the conference,” Taitz said. (1)

The California attorney is asking “…how do we know that he (Kennedy) ever saw the brief?” In no uncertain terms clerk James Baldin told me that “I (Taitz) [was] not allowed to see the signature.” This denial of her right to see Kennedy’s signature “does not make any sense.” Perhaps her...

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: awjeez; barackobama; birthers; constitution; law; naturalborncitizen; supremecourt

1 posted on 02/15/2013 9:09:22 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

They DO NOT want this issue addressed

HE IS A FAKE INFILTRATOR AND THEY KNOW IT

Why else would they go through such lengths NOT TO show a lousy birth certificate ( and the fact that the one they did release is a provable phony should have outraged EVERYONE )


2 posted on 02/15/2013 9:13:39 AM PST by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
Unfortunately, there is NO evidence that any of them take their Oaths seriously
since they already ignored their Codes of Conduct,
then micturated on John Jay and the Law of the land.


3 posted on 02/15/2013 9:18:42 AM PST by Diogenesis (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
Orly Taitz is the only fighter in the "STOP OBAMA" warfare.

She's fixed on the obvious flaw in the "decision" to keep her away from the Supers.


What if your parents sat you down and said, "You're adopted and not of our blood", got up and walked away.

Would you accept that?

4 posted on 02/15/2013 9:18:58 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

There isn’t a court in this land that overturn an election.

Even CJ Roberts said that an election trumps the Constitution (ObamaCare)


5 posted on 02/15/2013 9:19:54 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (*Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Everyone knows 0bama is using a birth certificate STOLEN from Virginia Sunahara. I'll bet his real birthday isn't even Aug. 4, 1961. Also, his Social Security number was issued in CT.. And his Selective Service card has been proved fraudulent.

Also, get Nancy Pelosi under Oath and ask her why she changed the wording in her certification of 0bama as eligible when she was Speaker of the House. She removed the words "under the provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America" EXCEPT FOR HAWAII'S CERTIFICATION, SHE LEFT THAT IN.. WHY, NANCY? BECAUSE YOU KNEW 0BAMA WASN'T ELIGIBLE DIDN'T YA NANCY!!!!

6 posted on 02/15/2013 9:29:16 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

There is no law of the land...There’s only the law of the priviledged.....


7 posted on 02/15/2013 9:34:55 AM PST by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
Apart from symbolic significance this issue means absolutely nothing at this point.It means nothing because we *all* know that the US Senate will never,ever,*ever* vote to remove him from office.Osama Obama will either complete his term or he'll die in office.And for any FR moderator or Secret Service agent that might see this post...I'm not advocating or supporting *any* criminal act.However,I freely admit that I'd dance in the streets if Osama were to suffer a fatal heart attack or stroke.

Today!

8 posted on 02/15/2013 9:38:38 AM PST by Gay State Conservative ("Progressives" toss the word "racist" around like chimps toss their feces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Even if the SC vote all-zip, the barry is not illegible to serve - so what?
There is no one in any body or court that will do anything about it, whatever that might be.


9 posted on 02/15/2013 9:41:22 AM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

I beleive that THE ONLY chance anyone has of proving some type of identity fraud if the obviously altered Selective Service registration Obamugabe is using.

The changes are juvenile and glaring. Oabma’s only “out” will be to say that he is older (fits an earlier website that says he is 4 years older) and that he didn’t register in oppositional protest to the VN war.

The press will give him a pass (just as the “dodgers of canada” were given a pass).


10 posted on 02/15/2013 9:42:14 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (*Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
...get Nancy Pelosi under Oath and ask her...

Good luck with that.

Look, up in the sky, it's flying PIGS!

Which of the above will we see first?

11 posted on 02/15/2013 9:42:31 AM PST by tpmintx (Gun free zones are hunting preserves for unarmed people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


HASAN


HUSSEIN




HIS IQ IS OFF THE CHARTS!


12 posted on 02/15/2013 9:44:06 AM PST by devolve ( -------- -- --It is not where Obama was born that is the problem - it is where he*s living now--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Osama Obama will either complete his term or he'll die in office.

If Osama 0bama dies in office, it will be from old age, probably in about 2035.

13 posted on 02/15/2013 9:45:30 AM PST by tpmintx (Gun free zones are hunting preserves for unarmed people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

The fact that our court system refuses to hold a full trial for this issue is proof enough that it is known fact that Obama is not eligible

If you look at all the idiot cases that go to full trial in all various courts in this nation....we cannot get one court to hear a case brought forth by a US citizen dealing with the eligibility of the President? BS


14 posted on 02/15/2013 9:46:23 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Obama owns 5 votes on the court. We all know that.


15 posted on 02/15/2013 9:49:59 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

May the Good Lord bless our Supreme Court today with the spine our Founders wished them to have when designing our government with three separate and equal branches.


16 posted on 02/15/2013 9:58:31 AM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
As much as I hate it, I fear the Constitution is dead.

The way the state run media covers for this Marxist a-hole is just sickening.

If he doesn't declare himself dictator for life, I fear we'll just get another Soros lackey in 2016 to complete the destruction of the Republic.

17 posted on 02/15/2013 10:06:55 AM PST by Marathoner (What are we waiting for? Where are the Articles of Impeachment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real
May the Good Lord bless our Supreme Court today

Yeah, right. This crap will be on Monday's loser list, "denied without comment" --the same fate of every other birther case that has crossed the Supreme's desk. It's amazing people still get all excited over this stuff.

18 posted on 02/15/2013 10:11:34 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

They have got the goods on the fraud, Obama. It’s time to act accordingly and throw him out of office and into a prison cell and those who helped him.


19 posted on 02/15/2013 10:13:45 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

You get on a plane for a long trip. You put your life in the hands of the airline and crew. Halfway there, you ask the stew if the guy in the cockpit is REALLY a pilot.


20 posted on 02/15/2013 10:18:18 AM PST by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real

Why has ROBERTS, and not some other judge, put this case in conference? What is going ON in this court?


21 posted on 02/15/2013 10:29:49 AM PST by doomtrooper99 (Mr Truman, you did not finish the job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

The only branch of the Federal Government with the power and authority to remove a sitting President for crimes, per the U.S.Constitution, is the legislative branch - Congress.

The power and authority to remove a usurper via Quo warranto was delegated, by Congress, to the District Court, Washington, D.C.


22 posted on 02/15/2013 10:29:49 AM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Even worse. Before and after the flight takes off, the pilot is seen on the body of the plane tearing apart its engine, the stewards, FAA, and company owner all swear that it doesn’t matter whether the pilot is really a pilot and not a hijacker, and the passengers all say, “OK” and go back to watching the in-flight film. The media (and some Freepers) attack those who point out the sabotage underway. When law enforcement points out the sabotage underway they are also attacked.

Surreal times.


23 posted on 02/15/2013 10:29:57 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

It's amazing people still get all excited over this stuff.

It's depressing that people care so little about the Republic they lack the passion to defend it.


24 posted on 02/15/2013 10:30:10 AM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

When you notice the plane is flying upside-down and backwards, it may be too late to ask if the guy in the cockpit is REALLY a pilot ... but that doesn't make it a dumb question or unworthy of an answer.


25 posted on 02/15/2013 10:33:51 AM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Watching Hillary pull off that ‘actress of the year’ stunt REALLY REALLY REALLY TICKED ME OFF, because it was a clear sign that she was attempting to beat back further probing of team 0bama’s COVER-UP or downplaying of the attack so as to shield 0bama from damage to his re-election.. 0bama pulled the SAME stunt with Romney in the debate where he feigned anger because of Romney’s ‘act of terror’ challenge. The same psychology was in play here, compliments of Axelrod or Jarrett. How they let Hillary just walk away after her dramatic play act is beyond me.


26 posted on 02/15/2013 10:35:24 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel; doomtrooper99

Thomas already admitted they were “evading” the issue.


27 posted on 02/15/2013 10:35:36 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: so_real
"It's depressing that people care so little about the Republic they lack the passion to defend it."

That was the intent of their alinsky tactics here at freerepublic.

They were quite successful.

Of course, having the admin mods in their corner was also helpful.

28 posted on 02/15/2013 10:35:58 AM PST by Godebert (No Person Except a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: so_real

Ha! They say: “Well, actually he isn’t a pilot, but he’s REALLY, REALLY cool and it says on his resume that he’s real smart!”


29 posted on 02/15/2013 10:45:59 AM PST by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY; Oldpuppymax
"You get on a plane for a long trip. You put your life in the hands of the airline and crew. Halfway there, you ask the stew if the guy in the cockpit is REALLY a pilot."

Only, in this case, you asked prior to even boarding the plane.

Others joined in and asked as the plane was taxiing to the runway and yet more joined in asking for verification prior to takeoff.

The crew informed each asking, that their questions were frivolous and that they had no right in asking those questions to begin with. Some were even told that they would not receive the complimentary in-flight snack/beverages as a penalty for daring to ask such a question.

30 posted on 02/15/2013 10:57:42 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Even if they do evade the issue today, it would be kinda nice to set up a protocol for reasonable consideration in the future - literally every court has declared that all candidates, voters, citizens have no standing to contest any of the constitutional eligibility restrictions... and that’s just ridiculous. It’s hardly an unreasonable request.


31 posted on 02/15/2013 11:10:54 AM PST by alancarp (Obama will grab your guns and ship them to Mexican drug mobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

“.....The power and authority to remove a usurper via Quo warranto was delegated, by Congress, to the District Court, Washington, D.C.......”

Anybody try a quo warranto method yet?


32 posted on 02/15/2013 11:33:52 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

I don’t want a President Biden but Obama was never legally qualified to hold the office of President because he was not Natural Born. His father was a citizen of Kenya at the time of his birth.


33 posted on 02/15/2013 11:38:40 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

“She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy who denied her petition originally.”

“When school students touring the buildings came up to the Taitz group to ask questions, their teacher was said to have made them leave! (2)”

Two extremely relevant factors in the case against Obama and leaves many questions unanswered.

Who were the for African American clerks who denied Taitz her constitute all right to see Justice Kennedy’s signature and what were they wearing that day?

And who exactly was this school teacher who told her students to leave when the students began to ask questions?

Was it really a school teacher and were the others really students? Could it be that the teacher was really a member of the Trilateral Commission and just perhaps the students were North Korean avatars?


34 posted on 02/15/2013 11:45:00 AM PST by OKRA2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

I don’t know.


35 posted on 02/15/2013 12:38:14 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Aurorales; autumnraine; azishot; AZ .44 MAG; bergmeid; ...
Constitutional Eligibility

36 posted on 02/15/2013 2:58:35 PM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

That looks like an Obama double. LOL


37 posted on 02/15/2013 3:03:00 PM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

He wouldn’t need to use fake docs if the info on them was correct....


38 posted on 02/15/2013 3:43:05 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Orly Taitz tried Quo Warranto in 2010 (Taitz v Obama). It was dismissed.
Montgomery Blair Sibley has another Quo Warranto suit also being heard in conference at SCOTUS today. It also was dismissed by the lower courts and by the SCOTUS in a previous incarnation. (ex-rel. Sibley v Obama).
http://www.scribd.com/doc/80165956/EX-REL-SIBLEY-v-OBAMA-USDC-D-C-First-Amended-Certified-Petition-for-Writs-Quo-Warranto-Etc


39 posted on 02/15/2013 3:44:45 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Not a surprising comment coming from you, Drew. Interesting how you have no respect for the birther movement yet you post on the birther threads regularly. Most people just ignore what they consider idiocy and move along. I often wonder what might be your motivation....


40 posted on 02/15/2013 3:59:33 PM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: visually_augmented
I often wonder what might be your motivation....

Are you kidding? Orly Taitz is nothing if not entertaining! I swear, her birther crusade could be a Coen Brothers' film.

41 posted on 02/15/2013 4:17:17 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: visually_augmented

I don’t wonder at all.

Real conservatives who care about the Constitution and don’t think his eligibility will ever be addressed just don’t post on these threads.

Anyone who thinks his eligibility (or rather, lack of it) is a non-issue as in not important, or that there is no doubt about it, are neither conservative nor do they care about the Constiution or rule of law.


42 posted on 02/15/2013 5:07:49 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Thanks for the Ping.

The Powers That Be in DC and the national security apparatus may have gamed out the various scenarios where "Obama" is outed as the fraud he is and concluded the risk of the country's destruction is too great For such to be allowed to happen.

For myself however, I pray every day that he and his handlers and enablers are exposed for all to see, and in spectacular fashion.

"if you have integrity, nothing else matters. If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters."

Applies to the rule of law also.

43 posted on 02/15/2013 5:27:53 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome ("Obama": His entire life is Photoshopped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; Polarik; Beckwith; TigersEye

Ping !


44 posted on 02/15/2013 7:00:50 PM PST by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doomtrooper99
The plaintiff requests the conference of the Supreme Court Justice of his choice - in this case, Justice Kennedy first, and then Chief Justice Roberts.

Why C.J. John Roberts? And why Justice Anthony Kennedy before him? It was Atty. Orly Taitz who directed the plaint to these two Supreme Court Justices. One or the other will have to be on board, along with Associate Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, for the case to proceed to oral arguments. If both had refused, it would have been pointless to petition Justice Scalia, Thomas, or Alito to bring up Noonan et al v. Bowen, only for it to be denied in conference. Better that the case be quietly ignored by two than publicly denied by six.

But for Noonan et al to win, both C.J. Roberts and Justice Kennedy must rule for the plaintiffs. So it makes sense to address the plaint to the two Justices in the balance, eliciting their support in order to win them over.

@Venturer wrote, "Obama owns 5 votes on the court. We all know that." No, not all of us "know" that, as is evidenced by the old saw, "The Constitution means whatever Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy says it means on any given day." Justice Kennedy is not a conservative like Justice Scalia, but he is no Justice Ginsburg either. He is the swing vote on the Court. Remember, it was Justice Kennedy who voted against the Unaffordable Obamacare Act, and it was C.J. Roberts who caved.

Keep praying and faint not - keep fasting and give up not! Remember... even the American Revolution was only won at the last hour, and that only because bad weather prevented Gen. Cornwallis' escape by sea. Even the salvation of the world, dead in trespasses and sin, seemed to be a lost cause, with the Savior crucified, dead, and buried, and His disciples scattering - until God, the Father and the Holy Spirit, returned life to its Author, Life Himself. God specializes in raising the dead, even the dead country, when it is most obviously beyond the power of man to do so.
45 posted on 02/16/2013 12:47:10 AM PST by MinutemanCDC_SC (While we yet have self-determination, remove the usurper from office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MinutemanCDC_SC

Folks appear to be confused about Noonan v Bowen. First, and most importantly, this is NOT an appeal of a lawsuit to the Supreme Court. It is an Application for a Stay. Please take a look at the actual Supreme Court Docket:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

Most folks are familiar with the Supreme Court issuing Stays of Execution in capital murder cases. The stay being requested in Noonan v Bowen is to stop the certification of California’s Electoral votes until the California Secretary of State has vetted Barack Obama. Of course, the problem with that is that the California Electoral votes have already been certified. Granting Ms. Taitz’s application for a stay now would be like granting a stay of execution after the prisoner has already been executed.
The reason that this application went to Justice Kennedy first is because it is a California application and Justice Kennedy is the regional Supreme Court Justice for California, each of the justices handles applications from a different region of the nation.
Once the regional Justice has rejected an application, the Respondee has the option of submitting it to each of the other Justices, but usually a denied application is submitted secondly to the Chief Justice who then submits it to the full Court for a Friday Justices’ Conference.
Unlike a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (a request to have the full court rule of an appeal) an application for a stay or an injunction requires the approval of five Justices in order to be granted. Writs of Certiorari require four Justices’ concurrence.


46 posted on 02/16/2013 2:05:34 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
I swear, her birther crusade could be a Coen Brothers' film.

Francis McDormand could pull it off...and probably win an Oscar for her turn as deranged dentist Orly Taitz.

47 posted on 02/18/2013 9:00:30 AM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson