To: taildragger
Agree with all you said. Little correction, though:
sea seed change
2 posted on
08/13/2012 5:45:52 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: taildragger
Romney should publically support Chick-Fil-A every chance he gets, on the basis of free speech. He should point out that free speech is the basis of our society, and that one does not lose his or her rights under the Constitution just because one is the CEO of a successful corporation. The Constitution protects everyone, not just homosexuals.
He should beat this point like a drum. The best defense is a good offence, and the homosexuals are going to roll him on this if he doesn't come on strong.
He might also point out that the homosexual movement wouldn't have gotten where it is without free speech.
I don't know if the second point is as powerful as the first.
Basically, homosexuals are trying to create the predicate that one loses one's rights if one doesn't agree with them and also runs a company.
Coming soon: you lose your rights if you don't agree with them no matter who you are.
3 posted on
08/13/2012 5:54:35 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: taildragger
4 posted on
08/13/2012 5:54:40 PM PDT by
Qwackertoo
(Romney/Ryan 2012 The Future of Our Children and Their Children are at stake.)
To: taildragger
Romney should publically support Chick-Fil-A every chance he gets, on the basis of free speech. He should point out that free speech is the basis of our society, and that one does not lose his or her rights under the Constitution just because one is the CEO of a successful corporation. The Constitution protects everyone, not just homosexuals.
He should beat this point like a drum. The best defense is a good offence, and the homosexuals are going to roll him on this if he doesn't come on strong.
He might also point out that the homosexual movement wouldn't have gotten where it is without free speech.
I don't know if the second point is as powerful as the first.
Basically, homosexuals are trying to create the predicate that one loses one's rights if one doesn't agree with them and also runs a company.
Coming soon: you lose your rights if you don't agree with them no matter who you are.
5 posted on
08/13/2012 5:54:50 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: taildragger
Chick-a-fil voters are primarily social conservatives who are tired of the homosexual agenda being forced on us. Lots of churches grouuped together to go.
6 posted on
08/13/2012 5:55:56 PM PDT by
Linda Frances
(Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
To: taildragger
Now if we could all muster up the courage to wage economic warfare on the advertisers for the MSM that subverts our nation.
McDonalds? Proud supporter of GLBT. We need someone like Fox to start a conservative cable media company so that Comcast is crushed.
7 posted on
08/13/2012 5:57:36 PM PDT by
Salvavida
(The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
To: taildragger
What we saw on 8-1-12 is just the tip of the iceberg compared to what’s coming in November. Millions and millions of silent, angry patriots will be headed to the polls.
As for me, I’ll be voting early, then heading to Chick-fil-A for a nice lunch.
9 posted on
08/13/2012 7:06:37 PM PDT by
Kharis13
(That noise you hear is our Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson