You would have a really good point if this current statement were the first one, but added on top of years of political support of the homosexual agenda, you don’t.
“You would have a really good point if ...”
No, I just have a really fine point. The article is ridiculous.
IF Romney put race and gay rights on the same level (which he didn’t, the mere list in a sentence doesn’t turn apples into oranges) then the level he put them on is that on both race and sexual orientation he OPPOSES the agenda of the left. Period.
How can the author miss the fact that he was in front of a left wing race group, which BOOED him. They didn’t get on their chairs and cheer.