Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael Barnes
This ruling was to protect and expand the “national” government which is dramatically different than a “federal” government.
If one belies a national government of one central power with unlimited power to tax and spend is better than a federal government that has 57 individual sovereign state governments then Roberts is merely carrying out a legacy dating to the ratification of the US Constitution.

Ben Franklin's often quoted phrase “You have a republic if you can keep it.” was a portent of this future. The Constitution itself set up a the adversarial relationship between and a central government on one hand and state sovereignty and individual freedoms on the other. The further removal of state protection by changing the process of selecting US Senators whom, once elected, had no physical or practical ties to the well being of their individual state accelerated the the demise of state sovereignty.

We are living witnesses to the completion of a national government and the demise of any semblance of a republic.

13 posted on 07/02/2012 5:28:25 PM PDT by lag along
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: lag along
We are living witnesses to the completion of a national government and the demise of any semblance of a republic.

Exactly!

What Roberts is saying is: if you can conjure up a 51.1% majority, you can screw over the 49.9% left any way you please and I won't interfere.

15 posted on 07/02/2012 5:33:36 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson