Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: kenavi; SAJ; Hostage
I left one word out:

Given the penalties and regulatory risk, a reputable broker-dealer would not deliberately engage in NAKED short selling.
40 posted on 05/17/2012 11:43:13 AM PDT by kenavi (1% of the 1% were born in the 1%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: kenavi

Well to make the distinction between shorting and naked shorting is crucial and to your credit but you also included in the same sentence the word ‘reputable’ which is in the eye of the beholder.

Floor traders follow rules well enough to give the appearance of a well-regulated exchange but floor traders do not know if the sell order originates from a stock holder, a short seller or a naked short seller.

So ‘reputable’ means essentially nothing on the Street. You can follow all the rules and still be complicit in a crime knowingly or not.


42 posted on 05/17/2012 12:02:24 PM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: kenavi
The article above itself proves your view to be incorrect. Read the quote from the Merrill Lynch guy again.

Either Merrill Lynch is disreputable (perfectly possible) or some reputable dealers/mms do allow/encourage naked shorting.

47 posted on 05/17/2012 2:12:28 PM PDT by SAJ (What is the next tagline some overweening mod will censor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson