Skip to comments.Breitbart.com will NOT have an Obama bombshell video
Posted on 04/28/2012 4:47:19 PM PDT by rightjb
Steve Bannon Says Breitbart Will Not Have an Obama Bombshell | @PolitiJim's Rants for Reasonable People | http://bit.ly/JtyXFx
I have just spent two days at the True the Vote National Summit featuring James OKeefe, Anita MonCrief, Christian Abrams, Pat Caddell, John Fund and many others. I wanted to rush two newsworthy items out before a much more thoughtful and comprehensive post tomorrow on the conference.
The final speaker was the Executive Chairman of Breitbart.com and Sarah Palin THE UNDEFEATED Producer Steve Bannon who broke a bombshell by saying:
Breitbart will not have a magic video that will change the election. It is going to be done at the grassroots level by ground troops (like True the Vote.)
Many have noted that Andrew Breitbart seemed to indicate at CPAC 2012 something much more profound and injurious to the Obama campaign when he said:
(Continued at: http://www.politijim.com/2012/04/breitbart-will-not-have-obama-bombshell.html)
This is a pattern with threats to the Left. I can't recall a similar history against the Right.
Ruby killed Oswald before he could testify.
Ron Brown dies before he testifies before Congress.
Vince Foster dies before he can resign and leave Washington.
Carlos Ghigliotti, FLIR expert, dies of a heart attack before testifying about the Waco massacre.
Lt. Quarles Harris Jr. is shot before testifying about improperly accessing Obama's passport records.
Breitbart dies suddenly after threatening to expose Obama.
Now the LA coroner lab technician dies before the final report on Breitbart comes out.
“Breitbart was a gutless coward on eligibility from the very start. Why the strange desire to make him into some kind of Birther martyr? “
I’ve hear people like you, armchair warrior nobodies, call everyone gutless cowards (Rush, Levin, Brietbart) because they don’t talk about the BC 24/7.
As soon as you do 1/1,000,000,000th as much for conservatism that these guys have done, get back to us, eh?
When I “step back” and look at the whole breadth of left-wing strategy and tactics, things like this fit in so well.
a) Either way, it causes division (as it is here) amongst the right.
b) Either way, it provides a story that can be used to brand people on the right as crazy and ignorant.
As a common thread across all the left’s strategy, there is the lie. Not only does the left accept lying by their operatives, it’s the foundation of every plan and pronouncement. Once they get enough young American’s indoctrinated through the educational system (which they now have) they have enough popular acceptance of lying by the general public that they can release official press statements that are bold-faced lies, and it’s simply thought of as “rough-and-tumble” politics. “Oh, both sides lie”.
I greatly fear that you are correct.
I think the “bombshell” is a dud without Breitbart. He was the salesman who could turn the mundane into a news story.
They don't talk about Article 2 eligibility at all, unless it is to ridicule and mock those defending the Constitution. What have those so-called Conservative talking heads done for Conservatism, besides installing Obama for four years, and now nominating another socialist standard bearer from the Megan McCain/Lindsay Graham wing of the republican party?
What have YOU done specifically to advance Conservatism?
I'm with you - original doubts, then this. Makes one really worried about where we will go if Obama is reinstalled in the WH. I wouldn't make any long-term commitments with a repub President who actually tried to undo the atrocities that have been put in place either.
I have not seen the actual coroner's report. I've seen media reports on it. One report said the cause of death as heart failure, which would be incorrect. Plus I don't know that Mr. Breitbart’s medical records are a matter of public record. Oh I read his relatives claimed Mr. Breitbart had no heart disease. Given that the reported cause of death was false, I'm not sure I trust that either. It's also possible that the family was unaware of his heart problems. It's also possible Mr. Breitbart wasn't aware of those problems either. Could be he had symptoms but chose to ignore them and not tell his loved ones. It could he had no symptoms at all.
We can go on forever speculating, but unless the actual autopsy report and Mr. Breitbart’s medical records are made public, we will never know. Even with the autopsy report and medical records, it might be necessary to call in an expert such as Dr. Wecht. But that's not going to happen so long as there is no suspicion of wrongdoing. So you cab wonder and speculate, but the bottom line is we may never know. And all thus endless speculation and rumor mongering wastes valuable time and effort better spent in ridding ourselves of the evil in Washington.
We can go on forever speculating, but unless the actual autopsy report and Mr. Breitbarts medical records are made public, we will never know.
The problem (or one of them) as PieterCasparzen noted above, is the deep ocean of falsehood that is the very nature and foundation of leftists. So, even if an autopsy report or medical records are somehow made public. We can assume that any suspicious or revealing facts will have been scrubbed or changed, just as every aspect of the life of the stinking pile in the White House has been scrubbed and changed and made up out of whole cloth.
At this point anyone worrying about the leftists/MSM (but I repeat myself) branding conservatives or Rs (NOT the same thing necessarily) as nuts, kooks and so on is part of the problem.
We are in Nazi Germany right now, and worrying about whether Hitler and his buddies don’t like us or think we’re kooks is merely paralyzing. They use the “kook” label because deep in their hearts they FEAR conservatives. They want to paralyze us with humiliation and ridicule; it’s the Alinksy way.
We better get our act together - especially those in positions of power and influences such as those in the mil, Sheriffs, LEOs, any person in any position of authority or public service - or we will find ourselves saying “I thought it couldn’t happen again” as it happens again.
Anyone who hasn’t watched Rumors of War Part 3 should do so. Our government is in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood and associated jihadi groups, knowingly. Why do you think this is, hmmm?
A) Most leaders in American politics, government, education and law have outright rejected God.
If they do profess faith in the God of the Bible, they reject study of God’s Word. Some are members of Congregations where doctrine has it’s own innovations. Others are not regular attendees of worship services. Others never attend worship. Many have dusty Bibles.
B) The left and islam share a common hatred of the God of the Bible, as well as a common hatred of America, whose founding Documents reject tyranny based on the direct and personal nature of God’s relationship to man. If one considers the ubiquitous New Testament doctrine of man’s access to God through the atoning death of Jesus Christ, one realizes that Biblical doctrine is the source which is appealed to by the American foundational claims, and there simply is no other source or appeal.
C) When leaders reject God’s Word, their words and actions offer evidence that they are not true believers. Since true believers are what communists and muslims are attacking, the unbelieving leaders neither see nor hear an attack on themselves, thus, they are not aware of the attack.
What is the right course of action then ?
“So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.”
They must hear the Word of God.
Let us be clear that they will not decide to “do the right thing” or choose to follow Christ.
“Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.”
The ironic thing here is that I DO have a bombshell video (or know the date of it) and I can’t get access. And, yes, it would affect the election. Anybody out there live near Vanderbilt U?
Track down the FULL video and you have a game changer. CNN records only go back to 1987 so you need to find an alternate source. Vanderbilt U?
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you need to threaten to report me to the Admin if I dont add you to the list...
If a politician is a believing Jew or any other monotheistic religion (not counting Islam of course) then I see no problem. Or at the very least respects and honors the basic principles supporting our country. (Although I don’t see how an atheist could sincerely do so.)
The left and Islam hate all religions (other than Islam of course); Muslims regularly and traditionally slaughter not only Christians but Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and pagans such as animists. They are not solely focused against Christians. Any non-Muzzie is an infidel. If they can’t find any regular infidels, they’ll slaughter the “wrong” sort of Muslims.
A good number of the founders of the country were more Deists or had varying degrees of belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ; yet their words are true and still a guiding light (or could be). Narrowing it as you do is a mistake, our country was certainly founded on Judeo-Christian morals and basic principles, but that does not mean our government should consist solely of Christians who share very specific religious beliefs.
Hmm, LucyT - maybe your list might have such a person that could help PJ?
Don't forget that same day (afternoon) Rush had to call a bomb squad to his home.
Here ya go:
<shameless plug>If you were on the Nut-Job Conspiracy Ping List, you'd already know this</shameless plug>
Not really subtle.
O is flat out caught...the world will hear about it in May
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.