Skip to comments.Breitbart.com will NOT have an Obama bombshell video
Posted on 04/28/2012 4:47:19 PM PDT by rightjb
Steve Bannon Says Breitbart Will Not Have an Obama Bombshell | @PolitiJim's Rants for Reasonable People | http://bit.ly/JtyXFx
I have just spent two days at the True the Vote National Summit featuring James OKeefe, Anita MonCrief, Christian Abrams, Pat Caddell, John Fund and many others. I wanted to rush two newsworthy items out before a much more thoughtful and comprehensive post tomorrow on the conference.
The final speaker was the Executive Chairman of Breitbart.com and Sarah Palin THE UNDEFEATED Producer Steve Bannon who broke a bombshell by saying:
Breitbart will not have a magic video that will change the election. It is going to be done at the grassroots level by ground troops (like True the Vote.)
Many have noted that Andrew Breitbart seemed to indicate at CPAC 2012 something much more profound and injurious to the Obama campaign when he said:
(Continued at: http://www.politijim.com/2012/04/breitbart-will-not-have-obama-bombshell.html)
A) Most leaders in American politics, government, education and law have outright rejected God.
If they do profess faith in the God of the Bible, they reject study of God’s Word. Some are members of Congregations where doctrine has it’s own innovations. Others are not regular attendees of worship services. Others never attend worship. Many have dusty Bibles.
B) The left and islam share a common hatred of the God of the Bible, as well as a common hatred of America, whose founding Documents reject tyranny based on the direct and personal nature of God’s relationship to man. If one considers the ubiquitous New Testament doctrine of man’s access to God through the atoning death of Jesus Christ, one realizes that Biblical doctrine is the source which is appealed to by the American foundational claims, and there simply is no other source or appeal.
C) When leaders reject God’s Word, their words and actions offer evidence that they are not true believers. Since true believers are what communists and muslims are attacking, the unbelieving leaders neither see nor hear an attack on themselves, thus, they are not aware of the attack.
What is the right course of action then ?
“So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.”
They must hear the Word of God.
Let us be clear that they will not decide to “do the right thing” or choose to follow Christ.
“Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.”
The ironic thing here is that I DO have a bombshell video (or know the date of it) and I can’t get access. And, yes, it would affect the election. Anybody out there live near Vanderbilt U?
Track down the FULL video and you have a game changer. CNN records only go back to 1987 so you need to find an alternate source. Vanderbilt U?
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you need to threaten to report me to the Admin if I dont add you to the list...
If a politician is a believing Jew or any other monotheistic religion (not counting Islam of course) then I see no problem. Or at the very least respects and honors the basic principles supporting our country. (Although I don’t see how an atheist could sincerely do so.)
The left and Islam hate all religions (other than Islam of course); Muslims regularly and traditionally slaughter not only Christians but Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and pagans such as animists. They are not solely focused against Christians. Any non-Muzzie is an infidel. If they can’t find any regular infidels, they’ll slaughter the “wrong” sort of Muslims.
A good number of the founders of the country were more Deists or had varying degrees of belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ; yet their words are true and still a guiding light (or could be). Narrowing it as you do is a mistake, our country was certainly founded on Judeo-Christian morals and basic principles, but that does not mean our government should consist solely of Christians who share very specific religious beliefs.
Hmm, LucyT - maybe your list might have such a person that could help PJ?
Don't forget that same day (afternoon) Rush had to call a bomb squad to his home.
Here ya go:
<shameless plug>If you were on the Nut-Job Conspiracy Ping List, you'd already know this</shameless plug>
Not really subtle.
O is flat out caught...the world will hear about it in May
In the New York Times? On CBS? How?
Sheriff Joe presser
He’s what 82? Too bad if he has a “heart attack” or sumpin.
Besides, his last presser got enough coverage to be totally invisible.
Oh wow, I didn't hear about that, thanks for the info!
your point ?
Read more: Read more: http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-03-01/politics/31115615_1_package-bomb-squad-tax-records#ixzz1tRxu2lge">http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-03-01/politics/31115615_1_package-bomb-squad-tax-records#ixzz1tRxu2lge
How convenient. Is that why they are scheduling the “war games” with Russia and China during May, about a week after the NATO summit in Chicago?
So, it tuns out the package was sent by a guy with a business opportunity for Rush?
If true, still sounds like piss poor judgment or maybe it just shows how far we've really sunk.
Sad either way.
IMHO sooner or later the MSM will not be able to avoid what Arpaio is making public. And again IMHO Arpaio and his posse have found evidence that backs up what people here have posited (what of course I have no idea other than my own thoughts) that will be so shockingly outrageous that it cannot escape the notice of various entities; including politicians, much of the general public - the ones not already hard leftists/drugged out etc - as well as more and more of the media.
Notice how even the MSM is admitting more of the truth of the Zimmerman/Martin issue. In fact it’s blowing up in their faces and will do so even more, I am sure, once more evidence is made public. So sooner or later the evidence be so clear and outrageous about who and what Zero really is and was, that even the MSM will have to say something about it. When their boy is going down, more and more rats will jump ship. They don’t want to wear orange, either.
Water washes away stone...
not sure what you mean
not sure what you mean
I'm sensing a pattern here...
July 20 ± one day.
Third option: It was a none-too-subtle warning.
I understand where you are coming from, and you may be very correct. I’m seeing this year as a huge game-changer no matter what happens and the little pieces I see fitting together in the big picture are extremely disturbing.
It’s frustrating to see some things positive and negative, and knowing that these issues are a HUGE chess game and that the strategy on both sides won’t likely be known until after it’s all over, leaves the little people (like me) on the edge of our seats.
I do as much as I can to give others within my personal “sphere of influence” the “little” pieces of truth I’ve gleaned, but their reaction is mostly to hide their heads in the sand - not sure if it’s out of fear, embarrassment, or desperate denial, but I’ve seen it even in my own family members.
Sitting back and waiting for the chips to all fall is a very uncomfortable position to be in - especially if you don’t know all of what those chips are, and afraid that even those in the know don’t see what’s coming up behind them!
I pray I’m wrong, but I feel this year is going to be a rough one, and it has nothing to do with the Mayans (unless you’re talking about some biker gang in the Sons of Anarchy show whose plot so closely mimics Fast & Furious).
[Could my post have been anymore vague-sounding? LOL My apologies if no-one can follow this post. There are so many little issues that it’s hard to combine them all to explain adequately my concerns (it’s not JUST Obama)]
An ee cummings lack of capital letters.
I drop my g’s too
Given the totality of events that day, it is most likely the correct one.
The strange desire to be a birther martyr? - First, I’m not trying to make him into a “birther martry”. Second, I reject your use of the term “birther” as I’m a CONSTITUTIONALIST. Third, with all of Brietbart’s contact with Sheriff Joe’s Investigative Posse do you not think it plausible that Brietbart was waiting for HARD, SOLID evidence before going out on that limb. ALL of us that have come forward thus far have been attacked on the issue mercilessly. I don’t think that ALL of those with a voice in the media have been silent precisely because they didn’t understand, or didn’t agree. I understand the motto; “Live to fight another day”. And, I understand the meaning of “getting all your ducks in a row”.
I had long been worried about a LOT of the so-called conservative media and their unwillingness to bring up the subject (some I still am worried about, but their actions and beliefs don’t determine mine).
I also believe I understand more now of what some people were saying - that his ineligibility is NOT enough, not because it’s not enough under our laws, but because we are playing a worldwide game of chess and the issue of Obama’s eligibility is just one part of the whole (it’s only one chess piece, and the ones in charge of the game see him as only a pawn).
Also, in case you haven’t noticed, it’s EXTREMELY hard to get ANY of Obama’s supporters to even LOOK at the evidence, much less look with an open mind. Hence, why the big picture is becoming more important (not that Obama’s ineligibility has become LESS important mind you).
Do I believe Obama is ineligible - no doubt in my mind that he is NOT who he says he is, and that nearly all of his “official” papers are forged, or tampered with, or *hidden* in some way, hence that Obama is NOT a lawful President of these United States. The thing I’m worried about now is that the Communist interests across the world are going to USE this crises to gain a foothold in the US and Obama is stupid enough to LET them thinking it will somehow protect HIM personally... (see upcoming “war games” with China and Russia - the plot of the Russian “game” is a lot like the original “red dawn”, except they’ve added Chinese destroyers and other Chinese military vessels to the game).
I don’t think we have enough TIME to ferret our way out of the eligibility issue at this point. Obama’s fake BC, Selective Service record, etc... is quickly becoming “small potatoes”, but I by no means dismiss it.
As for Brietbart, I would like to believe - seeing as he had met with Sheriff Joe who HAS hard evidence is that the eligibility issue was one of many Andrew was going to hit Obama over the head with this election season. Even if he DIDN’T believe the Communists/Socialist/Radical Islamist Troika had somehow tampered with records to make Obama *appear* eligible on the surface, Brietbart exposed SO MUCH of the OTHER issues we as a country are facing that I don’t think he’s someone to dismiss precisely BECAUSE he didn’t venture into the field of Obama’s eligibility. It could be because he knew others were covering it in-depth and he may have made the estimation that his time was better spent investigating the numerous other anomalies, and people around him. I don’t think we can read Andrew’s mind - especially now that he’s gone, nor can we guess what he believed while he was alive.
One more thing to consider - do you think, had he come out strong on the “birther” issue, that he would have opened or closed more doors to information on Obama? If most of Obama’s followers think that those of us concerned about eligibility are a bunch of loons (which we ARE NOT), but if they think we are, then are they even going to bother sitting down with someone who supports and talks about that theory? My point being - could he have gotten an interview with Ayers, etc... if he HAD been really outspoken on the eligibility, or was he able to fly a little closer to the radar precisely because he didn’t?
Like I mentioned - this is a HUGE chess game, and everything relating specifically to Obama would disappear were he to be gone, but the organization, the networks, the big picture are ALL still there whether we get rid of Obama or not.
[PS - New puppy HAS to go outside, so it will be a bit, and I haven’t had time to adequately edit/proof this post.]
I’m sure Breitbart did die of a heart attack. But the only way we’d know if it was a naturally-occurring one rather than induced by a heart attack gun is by knowing whether there was a tiny pin-prick red spot where a dart went into his body.
And the guy who very likely photographed Breitbart’s body for the coroner was the very guy who was killed under suspicious circumstances (according to the ER personnel and the cops) - just in time to clear the way for those photos to be altered before the final autopsy results were due to be out a week later.
What you don’t seem to grasp is that assassinations are designed to be unprovable. But as multiple critically-timed unespected deaths by critical people start to pile up.... it stretches credulity to believe them ALL to be coincidence.
Especially when the desired effect is always reached: silence from the people who have the power to expose Obama/Soros. Why do YOU say these people are keeping absolutely quiet?
Did you really believe Ben Shapiro when he told Mark Gillar that Breitbart wasn’t going to address probable cause for forgery and fraud involving Obama’s BC and draft registration because those 2 federal felonies weren’t significant enough to waste time on?
Why do you think Sean Hannity said he would vet Obama whatever the cost (what cost did he think there would be) and then scheduled Mike Zullo of Arpaio’s posse to be on his show? And why do you think Fox canceled Mike’s appearance at the last minute?
Why do you think Rush Limbaugh had a bomb scare the same day as Arpaio’s presser?
If we were talking about technology/capabilities that probably don’t exist or situations where there was one sudden unexplained death I could possibly buy your point. But we’re talking about a pattern of behavior regarding Obama’s eligibility where there are so many known threats and so many suspiciously-timed “unexpected” deaths that only a fool could ignore the pattern the dots make altogether.
The toxicology tests showed no prescription drugs in his body. The coroner’s office had said very early on that Breitbart hadn’t been seen by a doctor for over a year. That doesn’t match the stories Breitbart’s friends came out with - including that he had been in the hospital for a couple weeks within the past year because of a heart attack. The statements by the coroner’s office strongly suggest that those were complete fabrications. Why are these people fabricating these stories, according to you?
Because less than 5 hours before he died Andrew Breitbart was on the phone with Joe Arpaio telling Joe that he was glad Joe was going to present that evidence to the public because it was convincing.
Soros had already threatened the alphabet-media heads if they reported on eligibility, and the media heads had passed it on the on-air personalities as threats to their careers, possibly lives, and possibly family members’ lives. But that didn’t include Breitbart. Breitbart had refused to get on the birther bandwagon because he believed we would never get access to records that could actually prove anything. And until we had law enforcement involved that was somewhat the case. To have Breitbart reverse himself and use his own company to get Arpaio’s evidence out there.... would have been devastating to Obama’s cover-up.
Breitbart had to go. The moment he heard Arpaio’s evidence and affirmed it as convincing and valuable for the world to know.... he signed his own death warrant.
Just an interesting aside here. I’ve commented that Breitbart’s company refusing to address only the eligibility issue indicates what issue Breitbart was really assassinated over. So now Breitbart has apparently been threatened into not addressing the other stuff either. That makes it appear a little less obvious that it was the eligibility issue that he was assassinated for. But Breitbart didn’t decide to keep quiet on the other stuff until after it was noted that what they were really keeping quiet on was the eligibility issue.
He should have immediately given it to the UK Daily Mail - at least we would get a chance to see it. :)
I think your post is an excellent companion to my response (see #80 - my apologies for not pinging you as I did forget).
I AM convinced that it WAS this issue that he was getting “too close” to. It’s the bedrock issue that WILL undermine all of Obama’s personal power, but I’m also considering that taking Obama out of the picture is NOT enough (as I’m sure you see too). We have to expose ALL of them, but this issue might just do it - or might at least give the US more time to expose the bigger plans. (I keep switching NOW between is it enough - or isn’t it? I have long spoken about and believed that this was an essential piece, but as I’m putting together more of the pieces, it is a “pawn” piece which tells you just how bad this *game* that they are playing really is.)
The thing is, where the media and publicity used to protect whistle-blowers or fellow journalists they are now in the business of protecting their chosen political agenda and truth be damned. One “downside” of the “new media” is the the “old media” COULD try to paint Brietbart as another one of many “bloggers”, but thank God he was at least too well-known for THAT ploy to work in regards to his legacy.
over here ...
I agree with everything except this one point. In the case of the coroner dying of arsenic poisoning, that is not subtle. People don’t ingest arsenic by accident and very rarely on purpose. Perhaps the Zero team is getting a wee bit nervous, and/or want to be more obvious to instill fear in more people.
All of that ought to go away if he's ultimately shown to be a fraud foisted on the American people by global interests that are opposite to American interests.
In the best of all possible worlds, Americans will then hold Democrats responsible for undermining the legitimacy of America's constitutional republic.
I agree and for other reasons as well. The entire fraudulent usurping edifice needs to be exposed, brought down and punished. Sets a very bad precedent otherwise.
Hey LJ, I apologizing for forgetting you on my post at #80 as well. I’ve been sick, but as you may be able to tell, I’m on my way back. And, my effectiveness, I ‘hope’ will be MUCH better than previously. :)
"Breitbart had to go. The moment he heard Arpaios evidence and affirmed it as convincing and valuable for the world to know.... he signed his own death warrant."
Breitbart spent all of 12 minutes on the phone with Arpaio. If Breitbart was so interested in Arpaio's evidence, why did he have no plans to attend Arpaio's news conference?
Just listen to Breitbart.com's Ben Shapiro. He makes Grima Wormtongue look like a piker.
Let me make this simpler (and yet I STILL hope I’m wrong);
Obama’s cover-up isn’t holding - not with the “birther” issue, nor with the Fast & Furious issue.
His OWN supporters have seen that this man will be ineffective very soon.
Those above him see him as a pawn whose use is quickly disappearing as there are too many mistakes.
Obama is a PAWN in a world-wide chess game AND he’s stupid enough to believe that his *friends* like Putin, Chavez, the Chinese etc... are somehow going to protect him from the inevitable fall.
What Obama fails to realize is that these interests have been WORKING this plan since before Obama ever took his first breath.
Obama is gullible and narcississtic enough to believe his own propaganda and everything these interests are promising him and have absolutely NO intention of delivering, but even Obama fails to see how big that forest is and that the lumberjacks are the ones he’s counting on to PROTECT his part of the forest.
Remember the little blurb about the high-ranking Chinese official and his wife who Obama refused political asylum to?
Do you REALLY believe a Communist official would be STUPID enough to involve his WIFE in a murder plot of an English Businessman? Do you really think that this man would be stupid enough to get TWELVE of his fellow communist comrades to kill this man? Who even IS this English businessman - my guess is that just like behind the Iron Curtain he was a useful life worth no value to them, except that they could “take care” of any officials who wouldn’t “get with the program”.
I’m sorry if my analogies, or metaphors are not clear. It’s rather hard to condense 50-60 years of building by unraveling the propaganda and players and translate that here, especially since the players aren’t even being honest with each other (think Hitler and Stalin).
AND, if I DO try to summarize it in this paragraph the only thing it will achieve is making me look like a nutter because there are parts of the whole that are NOT easy to explain... And, contrary to the popular notion, just because I can’t explain it easily does not mean I don’t adequately understand, or am off the mark.
The recipe for this is quite complex and there are a LOT of chefs in the kitchen and each of them THINKS they know the dish they are making, but some of the ingredients have been mislabeled and they don’t know how to differentiate oregano from basil when dried.
I think you’re “on the mark” with most of your statements, LJ. I just hope it’s enough because the threat of his ideology in the minds of the public is still going to be there, and the players who’ve been in the game before Obama even took his first breath have been at this for a very long time. You’re right that they will “jump ship” and disassociate from Obama, but there aren’t going to go anywhere, and I am beginning to think they really ARE using this issue and waiting for it to explode to sweep up the pieces and gain THEIR control. (Terrorists, Communists, et al... are nothing if not patient.)
And now we know the truth of it all.....
Because he works for “World NUT Daily” - few take the man seriously already and as long as HE is the one bringing it forward it’s easy for those in Obama’s camp to dismiss.
[PS - I don’t think I need to say this, but I don’t subscribe to the notion that WND and Joseph Farrah are “off their rocker”, but the “establishment” have succeeded in labeling him as such which is why it’s been so easy for the mainstream to dismiss, and even those on the “other side” who believe he’s ineligible to use WND as a respected resource. Breitbart didn’t HAVE those problems because he put up the proof alongside his words. Farrah and all at WND - despite my great respect for them, and my respect for all they have done, are working under a damaged “brand name”. THAT is why Farrah isn’t a threat - because he’s already (unfairly, IMHO) been discredited years before this as a pusher of “conspiracies”. The same as Alex Jones. They are the ones who history looks kindly upon, but people in their midst don’t understand. When one is sounding a bell that only few hear, others will readily accept the bell-ringer as someone crying wolf. The reason? Because those working on the “edges” of burgeoning issues are ALWAYS thought to be crazy because people fail to understand that just because someone is wrong on one thing, doesn’t mean they weren’t just missing the big picture, becoming misled, confused, or otherwise using misinformation given to them, which makes ALL they touch “contaminated” in the minds of the public.]
Sorry to hear about your illness and I hope you recuperate fully with no residual effects and don’t have to take horrid medicine either!
The whole edifice of commie/muzzie/racist/sodomandgomorrah-ism needs to be brought down, exposed, trounced, and punished. All of them. The ones who don’t go to jail need to be so exposed and loathed that they lose all their power.
One thing about the quadrafecta behind 0bastard - they all know dirt on each other, so they all in essence have guns pointed at each other.
They must be nervous wrecks.
Agreed. I do think we’re letting these folks off “easy” by just taking care of the Democrats. We also need to completely discredit the Democrats ideology and infrastructure as well - which is going to be even harder given how overwhelming their influence on younger generations have become at this point, and that they have had decades to influence them.
I believe people in my generation (the “Reagan Generation” - born in the early 70s to older parents) had enough exposure to our aunts, uncles, and immediate family members who served in WWII and understand the principles we were fighting for to see through half of the propaganda that some of my peers with later generation parents certainly were NOT taught.
What frightens me is the probability of me being on the “other side” of all of this had I not gotten pregnant and dropped out of college because I was on the SAME EXACT path (in one case the same school and major after my first two years at a Community College) as those friends of mine who are so awesomely intelligent, yet so incredibly blind.
A friend of mine who I greatly respected (and still have respect as a person and friend for) was even one of Obama’s STUDENTS at UofC Law School, and now understanding exactly what Obama was teaching makes me understand her even more and makes me understand even more how incredibly hard it would/will be to EVER reach her with the truth. Another friend of mine is PART of the media establishment so reaching him with the truth is perhaps even harder - and these are the REALLY intelligent people who’ve fallen for this. If we can’t reach them, what can we do about those without the capacity to understand how complex these issues are? Ugh... sometimes I wish I was a truly ignorant person as my life would be so much happier. Apparently, I took the “red pill” without knowing there was ever a choice! LOL
I have come to the disturbing place where I wonder if in a year or two I will be cursing myself for not getting out when I still could.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.