Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crooked Democrats Block Voter ID Laws to Cheat
scottfactor.com ^ | 03/15/2012 | Gina Miller

Posted on 03/15/2012 5:11:25 AM PDT by scottfactor

At this point, anyone who does not see that we are living under a communist dictatorship of the current administration in Washington is woefully ignorant or willfully blind. One of the latest outrages against America’s free and sovereign states has—no surprise—come at the hands of the lawless Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ, under the racist Eric Holder, has made a mockery of its own name, because there is no justice in that department. It has become nothing more than a strong-arm, thug tool for Barack Obama (or whatever his name is).

This week, the DOJ blocked Texas’ voter identification law, falsely claiming it would be a burden to Hispanic people in the state. The DOJ used an antiquated section of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as an excuse to block the law. Under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, certain southern states must get the approval of the DOJ before making any changes to their voting laws. This was put in place back in 1965 to prevent historical practices by some states, mainly in the South, that had thwarted black people’s ability to vote.

There is no longer any need for such a clause, because no one in this country who is legal to vote is prevented from voting—no one. Nevertheless, back in 2006, President George W. Bush signed a 25-year extension of that outdated clause, but even if he had not, the DOJ still would have dictated that Texas not enforce its own voter ID law, which was approved by the citizens of the State of Texas. You see, under this lawless administration, they do not need an excuse, like Section 5, to impose their dictatorial will on the states. They know that no one in Congress or the military will oppose them, because apparently, no one in authority has any guts to hold these criminals—from Obama on down—accountable for their illegal, unconstitutional, impeachable actions.

The simple question here is why do Democrats so viciously oppose common-sense voter ID laws? The simple answer is that Democrats, and even some so-called Republicans, cheat in elections. They have to cheat, because their communist ideology is diametrically opposed to the freedom and individualism that the majority of Americans cherish. Most Americans understand that communistic policies rob our freedom, our money and our way of life, and we want nothing to do with such monstrous dictates. Communism centralizes all the power of a nation into the hands of a tyrannical oligarchy which dictates every aspect of the citizens’ lives. We are now almost all the way there.

Not only do Democrats cheat, but they lie about the existence of election fraud. Their common refrain is that there is no such thing as election fraud, a ridiculous claim on its surface. When there is criminal activity in every conceivable place in our world, how can they make the stupid claim that when it comes to voting, there is no criminal activity? Well, because they lie, and they do not hesitate to tell the most outlandish whoppers imaginable. Considering the massive amount of power that is at stake in elections, only a fool would believe that election and voter fraud does not occur.

Of course, in order to make the statement that election fraud does most certainly occur, I should at least provide some examples. First, I want to make a note that diabolical, billionaire currency-wrecker, George Soros, created the “Secretary of State Project” back in 2006, in which he is attempting to install Democrats in the position of secretary of state all across our nation. As you know, among other duties, secretaries of state are the overseers of elections, candidate qualifications and election results, and they are able to manipulate state voter registration laws which can make election fraud easier (as in the case of allowing same-day registration and voting). Thus, Soros and his gang of globalist commies are worming their henchmen into these powerful positions. If there is no such thing as election fraud, why would Soros do this?

One of the latest, high-profile cases of election fraud was perpetrated by a Republican Secretary of State in Indiana. He was convicted in early February of this year of multiple felony counts and sentenced to a year of home detention. Since this was a Republican, you can easily find numerous stories on the Internet reported by the “mainstream” media. Election fraud by the Left is harder to find covered by these same media outlets, but it can be found with just a little bit of effort.

Also from Indiana back this past December was the case of the state chairman of the Democrat party having resigned as a result of election fraud stemming from the signatures to get Barack Obama on the ballot in the 2008 election. 500 signatures are required, and in this case 534 signatures were collected, but 150 of those signatures are declared to be forgeries.

The same article quotes a former Alabama Democrat representative, who is black, saying that voter fraud is rampant in the black districts like the one he used to represent.

There were many examples of election fraud stemming from the 2008 presidential election which saw a fraud installed in the White House. The group Minnesota Majority reported on more than a hundred voter fraud convictions stemming from the 2008 election with almost 3,000 convicted felons and otherwise suspected ineligible voters having voted, as well. The website Rotten Acorn has a huge list of election fraud convictions and allegations relating not just to the 2008 elections, but dating back to 1998.

The fact is that election fraud does occur, and although it is not limited to the communist Democrats, it is on the Left that the majority of election fraud happens. You will notice that it is only the Left that loudly clamors against voter ID laws. That is because having to present identification to vote to prove you are who you say you are greatly reduces the Left’s ability to cheat in elections.

Another grim and disturbing prospect in the upcoming presidential election is the fact that Obama’s Department of Energy conducted “research” through the Argonne Laboratory that showed the amazing ease with which electronic voting machines could be remotely hacked and the voting results changed—undetectably. Isn’t that just swell?!

Let’s not forget that the United States’ dominant election results reporting company, SOE, has been sold to a globalist election reporting company out of Barcelona called Scytl. This means that the election results for 525 U.S. jurisdictions and counting will be redirected through this foreign company before Americans can see them.

As reported by the website, Black Box Voting,

“A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to videotape [and] photograph these poll tapes in 2008.

With the merger of SOE and SCYTL, that won't work (if SCYTL's voting system is used). When there are two truly independent sources of information, the public can perform its own "audit" by matching one number against the other.

These two independent sources, however, will now be merged into one single source: an Internet voting system controlled by SCYTL, with a results reporting system also controlled by SCYTL.

With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, … or the count.”

Oh, there’s not a chance of election fraud in any of this! Yeah, right.

The bottom line here is that we are dealing with a power-mad man in the White House who has an almost supernaturally-powerful machine propping him up and moving the world for him. He is also greatly disliked because of his lawlessness and America-destroying policies. I do not believe there is any way he could legitimately win reelection. I do not even believe the polling data that claims that about half of America approves of Obama. I don’t believe it for a minute.

In order for him to be “reelected,” there will have to be a massive collusion of all of the above to undertake the most brazen election theft in American history. Between the foot soldier voter fraudsters on the ground, remote voting machine hacks, and who-knows-what kind of trickery that might occur as the votes of the American people are reported by foreigners, the prospect is breathtaking.

With all of this potential election wickedness, the communist Democrats in Obama’s Justice Department are desperately trying to prevent states from helping to ensure the integrity of elections with voter ID laws and anti-illegal alien legislation. The two issues go hand-in-hand, of course, since illegal alien voters are Democrat sweethearts.

The Democrats are flat-out lying when they say requiring proof of identification hurts minority voters. That is a crock of bull. Every American must show ID for a myriad of reasons, including to board a plane, to open a bank account, and to sign up for government taxpayer money handouts (the Left has no problems with that one, though). The Left never mentions the obvious fact that we all have to show ID regularly to live and work in this country; instead, they lie and say voter ID would prevent minorities from voting.

One point about this that I noted in one of my January columns titled, “Voter ID Laws are like Sunlight to the Vampire Left,”

“If voter ID laws were enacted in all states, it is likely that overall voter turnout would be lower, mainly on the Democrat side, of course. That is simply the result of all those dead and otherwise illegal voters not being able to cast their lawless Democrat votes.

… Dead voters remain on the voter rolls in every state. Purging of voter rolls of dead people and otherwise ineligible voters (as in those who have moved out of the district or state) is part of what needs to happen on a very regular basis to further prevent voter fraud. Of course, the Left fights any kind of effort to clean up the election process, and purging voter rolls is another thing the Left detests.”

It is time for the states to stand up and tell this Obama regime to take a hike. We need to enforce the state voter ID laws and anti-illegal immigration laws we pass whether the commie Obama and his buddies like it or not. Make the DOJ put its money where its mouth is, and see if they can stop us.


TOPICS: Politics; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: fraud; obama; voter

1 posted on 03/15/2012 5:11:36 AM PDT by scottfactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scottfactor

If Newt would like to do some good, while he still has a public stage, he should make a speech and say:

“The ONLY reason to block Voter ID, is to facilitate cheating.”


2 posted on 03/15/2012 5:22:26 AM PDT by G Larry (We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor

“Crooked Democrats”

Redundant.

IMHO


3 posted on 03/15/2012 5:22:51 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
4 posted on 03/15/2012 5:22:51 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor

Mark my words: Holder and Obama are planning for a loss in November that will create a Constitutional crisis.


5 posted on 03/15/2012 5:23:10 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor

Pennsylvania’s just got signed last night (should have happened last year).

Waiting for the DOJ in 3...2...1...


6 posted on 03/15/2012 5:23:35 AM PDT by SueRae (Tale of 2 Towers - First, Isengaard (GOP-e), then, the Tower of Sauron on 11.06.2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; Wisconsinlady; ...

Wisconsin interest ping — Voter ID

FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.

Although this story is not directly about Wisconsin, it relates to our own battle with voter ID.


7 posted on 03/15/2012 5:26:32 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor

Pennsylvania just Passed Voter ID expecting Holder to Make Sen Casey’s life hell.woohoo with an Injunction and Lawsuit


8 posted on 03/15/2012 5:26:56 AM PDT by philly-d-kidder (AB-Sheen"The truth is the truth if nobody believes it,a lie is still a lie, everybody believes it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor

Thanks for posting the entire article. I clicked on your site just for that.


9 posted on 03/15/2012 5:31:45 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor
This is the speech Rick Perry should make:

"After consulting with the Texas Attorney General, the Supreme Court of the State of Texas and other legal advisors, we have determined that this injunction from the Department of Justice is not binding on the people of the State of Texas.

Accordingly, we are proceeding with the institution of Voter ID for the coming election. Voters will have to produce a photo ID that matches their voter registration in order to cast a ballot in November.

Don't mess with Texas."

10 posted on 03/15/2012 5:36:20 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne (Mock the Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor

Progressives win both ways.

If they manage to coerce Texas into scrapping I.D. laws they open the flood gates of voter fraud.

If Texas resists them, then they can claim widespread
voter intimidation, disenfranchisement, etc., ad nauseum.

IMHO


11 posted on 03/15/2012 5:38:04 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor
You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how."
12 posted on 03/15/2012 5:50:41 AM PDT by bravedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor

Thank you for this.

I now have instant proof for the dorks on various sites who comment over and over, “There is no voter fraud”. “Name just one instance of voter fraud—name one”.

These challenges really pizz me off.


13 posted on 03/15/2012 6:49:46 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (EXTRA! EXTRA! 0bama loses Iraq and Afghanistan! 0bama's fault!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne

We’ve always proudly shown both without being asked. We vote in every election no matter what it is and we keep the little flag stickers to stick on the fridge.


14 posted on 03/15/2012 6:54:02 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (EXTRA! EXTRA! 0bama loses Iraq and Afghanistan! 0bama's fault!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

We voted here in Mississippi on Tuesday, and they now have different, larger “I voted” stickers. They are nice.


15 posted on 03/15/2012 7:16:23 AM PDT by WXRGina (Further up and further in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne

You are absolutely correct.... let the Supremes decide this... open defiance of this illegal regime is certainly justified...I keep asking what’s so bad about succession.


16 posted on 03/15/2012 7:38:26 AM PDT by Froggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: scottfactor

Tells it like it is. Though we already know most of this it is still shocking and highly disturbing to read.


17 posted on 03/15/2012 6:14:24 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson