Posted on 02/03/2012 2:19:38 PM PST by GregNH
We just spoke with plaintiff Kevin Powell and he reports Judge Malihi has ruled against the Plaintiffs and stated in his order that Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore Obama is a natural born Citizen.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
I find it interesting that a n00b is telling us what the judge did, as if the n00b assumes the authority to tell us what the judge did without telling us what the obama team did to instruct the judge without the plaintiff’s being privy to the instructions. It takes a special sort of enmey to play apologist for treachery. There is a certain smell about you, n00b.
This same judge, in a previous ballot issue, stated that the onus is on the CANDIDATE to PROVE eligibility. Obama did not and never has proved his eligibility. We simply do not know who he is. If he is eligible, then WHY does he continue to hide his proof?
It is not up to the plaintiffs to prove that he’s not eligible. In the same way that someone doesn’t automatically get a job without supplying proof of qualification, like college transcripts, references, proof of experience, test results, etc.
At least you can spell the name of the case right. Ankeny, not Arkeny. Malihi got it wrong, while he was pulling cases out of his rear.
If he was threatened his life isn't worth much yet. It's called sewing up loose ends. If I were in his place and threatened I would immediately call a press conference and tell the world that I and/or my family was threatened. If we are dead then such and such has done it. Obama's people are corrupt and evil and have threatened my life if I don't do what they want me to.
If he did this if he or his family came to harm than they would be fingered. He might be safer that way than as a loose end. He could still come out with the truth.
The judge pulls one out from the wrong state of Indiana. Hatfield may have a field day taking apart the worthless drivel that is written in Ankeny from the Indiana court, but this judge compounded his mistake by elevating Ankeny over the US Supreme Court holding in Minor v. Happesett. Although I don’t expect the judiciary on appeal to be honest since most have spines of jellyfish across the US. However, we all know what the truth is here and it’s not with Obama.
A dual national, one owing allegience to a foreign country, is eligible...but a naturalized citizen who renounced their foreign allegience is not.
What kind of sense does that make? It's like Alice in Wonderland stuff.
Crazy what's going on in this country.
If he were to do that, his decision (either way) would be immediately called into question as being influenced while under duress.
Yeah...like the suitcase full of documentation Orly gave to Chief Justice Roberts some time ago......he said he would "look at it"............crickets.
Yes, it was admitted into the record and will be there for Kemp to reconsider and for the appeals...as well as an additional new one from Leo picking apart Maliki’s efforts to morph the word “citizen” magically into the words “natural born citizen”!
DIY for the judge...not to you!
My daughter has an American BC and has foreign citizenship at birth. She is legally entitled to have two passports, serve in a foreign military, and then run for president of the United States.
My daughter can stand in front of the American people and promise to send half of our assets to another country if elected while waving her foreign passport on election day, and be qualified as a natural born citizen in the USA.”
So what?
If your daughter grows up here and imbibes a love for this country, she will have the chance to communicate that to voters and act upon those beliefs, if elected. What's wrong with that?
If she chooses to promise to send half of America's assets to another country, she would be a nitwit and her chance of winning the election nil. So your point is moot.
Eligible and electable are two different things. The first is an artifact of birth. The second is a question of convictions that must be successfully demonstrated to at least half the people.
I'm not frightened of your daughter, and I wish her well.
Not if correctly read, IMO. I don't agree with the plain English reading of Minor v. Happersett by the Ankeny court as cited by Malihi. The word “citizen” in the key sentence doesn't magically transform into “natural born citizen” and wouldn't even make sense in context, IMO. I await the appeals!
It’s no enough to ask the lawyer if he/she thinks her witnesses are experts. There is a specific legal process for establishing expertise in each jurisdiction, generally strengthened in the last thirty years due to valid conservative concerns about “junk science.”
It’s obvious from their resumes the witnesses offered by Orly would not have met the required standard.
Thanks for the ping Bitt.
Does this not feel like something akin to a declaration of war on the American people?
I just wonder what would happen if we social media’d this to the extreme through Twitter and Facebook? I mean people who have not talked about this stuff because they were just waiting for the courts to do the right thing, what if everyone on this thread just went berserk on social media keeping this in front of Americans every waking minute?
I also wonder what would happen if we said to the progressives, “okay, you made your bed, now your going to lie in it.” and then we proceeded to put up Rubio/Jendal for Prez./VP. Jumped with all our force behind them, and stacked the deck down-ballot? Then when all get in office, use ever law they passed to make conservative the norm. You know...freedom OF religion, not FROM...conception is where life begins...marriage means one man and one woman...honest days work for an honest days pay...bitterly cling to guns and religion...
This judge got Komen’d. Progressives really don’t need to gloat. It isn’t going to be fun for anyone when this type of government we now have reaches it’s logical conclusion.
Hatfield is a competent lawyer. It's going to be nice seeing him take apart the Obama opposition.
Now what happens to the petition that Orly Taitz was granted by Judge Malihi to supoena records from Hawaii?”
There is no such thing. It was a figment of Orly's imagination. She doesn't understand legal process.
Congress is not the trier of crimes. Law enforcement prosecutes crime. This has always been a law enforcement issue, except for the definition of NBC. If Obama shot a person in cold blood it would not be Congress that would take him away in handcuffs, and it should not be Congress that takes him away in handcuffs for forgery, perjury, and several other crimes that he and his cohorts have committed.
I respect your feelings on this matter, but the reason more lawyers don't take it up is because it doesn't really offer any opportunities for success. The issue of standing is all but insurmountable in most cases. As long as Hawaii says Obama was born there, the full faith and credit clause requires other states to accept that. And the interpretation of law as cribbed by the Georgia judge from Arkeny is accepted as a given in the profession. You simply aren't going to find many, if any, judges willing to entertain the two-citizen parent theory. And there's no way the Supreme Court will buy it.
Whatever one may personally believe, those are the cards dealt. Believe me, if this case was viable, there would be a number of high profile attorneys seeking fame from it. That there aren't says it all.
“If she chooses to promise to send half of America’s assets to another country, she would be a nitwit and her chance of winning the election nil.”
Well there you go. Just as the Founding Father’s envisioned it.
Bwahhhh. Really? Really?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.