Posted on 06/07/2011 5:38:05 AM PDT by Pacothecat
Is it self-defense to kill someone who’s trying to starve you?
Ha... you can’t starve people in Red states; they are doers, they provide for themselves, they’re planners, planters, growers and harvesters, they operate small businesses, they pay mortgages, taxes, and allegiance to the flag, they, THEY raise they’re children and bless their grandchildren... starve the Red states? Laughable... but if they could they’d be starving themselves, for who in the hell do they think keeps them fed and housed!
Secondly, let me see if I got this right?
A 26-year old "OPINION" by the GAO re: the "authority" of the Treasury Sec. has/had and continues to have the "Force of Law" and can not be overridden by Congress or any Court, including the Supremes?
Right and pigs fly!
Good luck with trying to implement that one, Moonbat.
Anyone want to guess how long it would take to line up a huge caravan of buses from FL filled with "Blue-Haired" ol' Granny's headed for DC if this was even ever suggested as a course of action?
Anyone want to bet how long it would take (I'm betting about an hour) to get an injunction by a Fed Judge somewhere halting this if ever proposed?
You can tell how desperate the Demo-Rats are getting when they reach that far down into their barrel of dirty tricks in an effort to advance their Socialist Agenda.
Nice try, but ain't gonna fly!
Especially if they can get the government to kill you for them.
And example of how the sheeperals look at their leftist leadership. Their base assumptions involve the "perfectibility" of mankind (ie, evolution), which naturally leads to the mid-conclusion that some people are far more advanced, both intellectually and morally, than others. These people naturally seek positions of power. Ergo, every leftist politicial leader is superior in intellect and morality, and can be trusted with as much power as they need to "help" everyone else.
His dismissal of an obvious counterexample is very predictable, because to accept it would be to shatter his base assumptions and invalidate his worldview. Let me guess, also, that he considers himself to be "one of them", ie, the "intellectual/moral elite".
All I’ve got to say is “come and take us!” Texas may have a thing or two to say about the economy of the US.
It was done in the Ukraine.
“Skin me, Brer Fox, snatch out my eyeballs, t’ar out my years by de roots, en cut off my legs, but do please, Brer Fox, don’t fling me in dat brier-patch!”
I certainly hope so, I’ve eaten enough of them.
I want bunny mommas to tell bunny babies how bunny daddy was served roasted with mashed potatoes and gravy one late winters evening as a warning about staying out of my garden.
The neighbor takes care of the deer.
Too many libtards are like that.
My idiot brother is one. When I confront him with facts his denies that they are true.
The best conservatives are often former liberals who have been mugged (or had a run-in with the government, which is almost the same thing)
Fitting that they advise comrade Obama to deal with opposition in a Stalinist fashion. Since most food producing states are anti-Obama, do they next advise Obama to send the army in to seize ALL food stocks for shipment to pro-regime states - a la Stalin's solution for Ukrainian opposition.
Now we know why Mark Levin characterizes things this way:
“Liberalism is the philosophy of the stupid.”
If you have a transparent map, and do the overlays, you’ll soon realize that the Red States produce nearly ALL of the food & energy in the United States.
The producers vs. the consumers.
The red states could survive without the blue states. And thrive, I might add.
Some of us just wish these blue states to secede, in fact. :)
Wouldn’t that be grand?
We have other choices.
I know very few liberal farmers, I’m thinking if we use food as a weapon it is liberals who will starve.
Farm raids? Let them try that in Texas.
2012=1860
Kind of hard to do since most of the food comes from red state. California is an exception, but the parts of Cali that produce the food are pretty red.
And that is - just outside their little comfort zone of that Big, Blue, City they live in, they're surrounded by RED in their own state. The exception would be some irrelevant little state like Rhode Island or Massachusetts.
Illinois is a prime example -- it ain't so blue. Without the urban cesspools it's redder than red. This fact can be verified by looking at the county by county election maps at CNN.com's election central. Take out Cook County and Dubya wins IL both times. (never looked with Barry)
So these Moonbats better think twice with their rhetoric, which is getting more and more 'violent'. They're outnumbered x105 to one.
They’re getting uppity right now because they have the State at their back,
and a guy in power that WOULD be willing to use the power of the state to punish political enemies.
My experience with liberal family members is that when the facts counteract their liberal world view, they "regroup" and find a way in which the victim of government brutality deserved what they got.
That happened in the 90s, when some (legal) immigrant had saved his whole life to buy some farmland in CA, and then had everything wiped out by the government because some allegedly endangered mouse remains were found in one of his fields. The left media (Pacifica network and its ilk) couldn't easily deny that the guy had been treated horribly and unfairly, so they spun a story about how he was so rich, he deserved everything that happened to him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.