Posted on 04/28/2011 6:26:54 AM PDT by wistful
Fact: Barry has been represented in numerous lawsuits challenging his eligibility
Fact: The challenges continue
Fact: Some of the legal cases are working their way through the higher ocurts
Fact: Barry (or his handlers) have paid his legal reps over $2 million in fees since 2009
Perkins Coie, of which his WH counsel Robert Bauer is/was a principal
I would not be so wary about claiming a million in legal fees (at least) has been generated by this issue. I do not dismiss WND research just because it is WND research.
“It is interesting to note that the first fake COLB (circa 2008) came replete with an endorsement of its authenticity from FactCheck.org.I wonder if a similar stamp of approval is forthcoming for this latest rendition?”
Yeah, good point.
It shouldn’t receive the stamp of approval, but it probably will. Factcheck maintained it was a Birth Certificate too so what do they know?
plus, what kind of professional forger would name a registrar U K L Lee (ukelele)
Listen, here is the issue that I see. If you are going to want the Ts crossed and Is dotted with Obama regarding facts then you should hold yourself to the same standard list only known hard facts especially when it comes to claims of amounts of money being spent
A real professional archivist would be happy and indeed, welcoming, of other professionals to view the quality of his work, of the documents and records under his keeping. I am surprised that Doctor Onaka hasn’t asked for such a professional review and vetting.
Honestly, how many times have you signed your name and “forgot” to put your first name in there? Seems weird doesn’t it?Never. But I have only one first name :-). Many people with several first names use only one of them. Perhaps she didn’t like “Stanley.”
Why would that be a felony? It was not presented in a court of law or anything. I could doctor mine up and post it on the internet. No law broken.
THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.
Unless of course the person is another leftist.
Then the problem’s solved. Gone. No more questions.
When they send a shuttle into space do you need to see all the receipts to know that it's expensive? LOL C'mon!
You make perfect sense, of course. The original records should be reviewed by reputable forensic examiners, included those representing folks who have challenged Obama’s legitimacy. That would raise the evidence to legal-process
.................................................
“An honest man has nothing to fear from a forensics test: like DNA evidence, it helps to convict the guilty and protect the innocent.”
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/not_so_fast_mr_obama_trust_but.html
FactCheck lies
There is a GREAT YouTube video out last night were a guy opens the doc in Adobe Ilustrator and picks up the different layers and moves them around. The whole ID block removes. Signatures, dates, all move. Impossible to do for a scanned document.That is not impossible at all. All you need is software that applies MRC-compression to PDFs. It will (try to) put the text and the background image automatically into different layers and compress them independently. This is a standard technique used by archiving software, for example. It is quite possible that the Apple PDF software they used for this PDF does it by default (I can’t check because I do not own a Mac).
Not a one, yes, alas, but many pretenders
So you're guessing. You don't actually know anything about that software.
Maybe the original only exists as a digital image. If so, why send your personal lawyer to retrieve it? Nothing is as it seems and many people are involved in seeing that it never is.
I think he is hiding obtaining a scholarship as a “foreign student”. What about the grandmother swearing he was born in Kenya? And Abercrombie saying there was no long form certificate even there in HI?
Good points. More importantly, if it were a forgery I would expect somebody in Hawaii to speak up at some point. I supposed it is possible that what is printed on the document doesn’t accurately reflect what is in the true record but as you point out, somebody would have to be willing to commit a felony to make that happen. Given all the attention this has garnered I can’t imagine someone being willing to do that.
Why doesn’t it look like mine? With my baby footprint, length, weight and religion? Didn’t Hawaii do it like NY State did?
Right you are. I would love to see a forensic document examiner take a look, but that won't happen, no way, at least not in our lifetimes.
Maybe 100 years from now, a historian will be allowed to examine the original documents and then he will write a book about all this. But for now, case closed (sad for the Republic).
“Maybe the original only exists as a digital image.”
I think there are two versions. One is a paper copy given to Associated Press that is represented on the net by an obvious scan. There are no problems with this document.
The second document came from the White House site (I think) and is in the digital format that has caused all the questions.
You can see both documents side by side here-
http://truebluenz.com/2011/04/28/pic-obama-long-form-birth-certificate/
The bluish colored one is the AP release.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.