Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POLL: Your Potential Presidential Candidate Preference
Conservatives for America ^

Posted on 03/29/2011 7:14:29 PM PDT by MaxCUA

Share Your Opinion: Your Potential Presidential Candidate Preference


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: palin; sarah; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Safrguns

But what Trump is saying now: “I want to see Obama’s birth certificate (oh and I might run for president)” just doesn’t add up with what he said four years ago: “We need universal healthcare, and I wish John Kerry had won in 2004.”

To Donald Trump I say sit down before more people find out what a fraud you are.


41 posted on 03/30/2011 4:37:07 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Sarah Palin is above taking the fake high road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NraFreedom

The day I use “numbersusa” to think for me is the day I go ahead and give up on everything.

The aura of trustworthiness around Sarah Palin is real. She’s trustworthy because she’s honest. (This means she doesn’t manipulate, and she doesn’t tell lies.)

False doubts fabricated by special interests can do nothing to diminish the fact that Palin can be trusted with immigration policy just like on everything else.


42 posted on 03/30/2011 4:46:15 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Sarah Palin is above taking the fake high road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
The one thing missing is—Palin never said that.

Think again. Amnesty(Palin Interview with Univision)

As governor, how do you deal with them? Do you think they all should be deported?
Palin: There is no way that in the US we would roundup every illegal immigrant -there are about 12 million of the illegal immigrants- not only economically is that just an impossibility but that's not a humane way anyway to deal with the issue that we face with illegal immigration. My comment: Palin is saying enforcing the current federal immigration laws is not humane. She must think President Eisenhower was inhumane since he deported 1.3 million illegal aliens to create work for Americans, particularly veterans.

Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants?

Palin: No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty. My comment: Not total amnesty? In other words she supports partial amnesty. Partial amnesty.

To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants

Palin: I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here.. My comment: Pathway to citizenship is spin for amnesty for illegal aliens.

Interview with Bill O'Reilly: Illegal Immigration: O'Reilly batters Sarah Palin on amnesty vs solutions (video & transcript)

Excerpt:

O Reilly: (interrupts) But what do you do with these folks? Do you make them register with the federal government? Do you tell them they have sixty days to get outta here before we put you in jail? What do we do with them?

Palin: Palin: Do we make them register with the Federal government? Yes, we do. We have to

O Reilly: (interrupts) Alright, So you don't reward the bad behavior. You make them register with the federal government. Say you give them sixty days to register with the fed gov., there's a form at the Post Office they have to send like a census form, alright. Say they don't do it? Alright.

Palin: You deport them.

O Reilly: (interrupts) Ok so After a period of time, the ones that don't cooperate then you catch them, they're gone. Now you have these people that register. You are going to have millions of them. Then they register and they say - ok we obeyed what President Palin told us to do -then what? - do you give them green cards to work right away, what do you do with them?

Palin: You know there has to be that expectation that they will work and that they will contribute. Bill, It makes me uncomfortable that we're even going down that path so far when ...

O Reilly: (interrupts)You have to though.

Palin: No, no

O Reilly: (interrupts) You have to go down that path, it's gonna come up.

Palin: No. American citizens who are - who are here lawfully - they need to be the ones with the first shot at getting these jobs. We cannot make it easy on those who have chosen to be illegal - illegally here, to disobey our laws. No! My comment- However she will allow them to work and live in the country so long as they register without having to leave the country and enter legally per current federal immigration laws.

O Reilly: No, we can't make it easy, but they're here and we can't starve them to death. And If they can't work, if they don't have a green card to work, ah, they're gonna be hosed. I mean they gotta pay rent, they gotta buy groceries, this, that and the other thing. I mean this is where it gets very complicated, Governor. You know it gets very, very complicated - because you are rewarding bad behavior. You let them stay in the United States because they came in illegally.

Palin: Then let's keep it, then, then we won't complicate it any more. Let's keep it simple. And let's say no that if you are here illegally, if you don't follow the steps that at some point in immigration reform that we are going to be able to provide that will allow you somehow to be able to work - if you are not going to do that, then you will be deported. You will be gone. My comment- The current federal immigration laws are already simple if they they were merely enforced! Palin's registration scheme would not only make the process more complicated but would eviscerate federal immigration laws!

Paling couldn't be more disingenuous. Registering illegal aliens allows them to remain in the country for at least the period they have to registered if not permanently. That is amnesty! These people have already demonstrated they have no regard for the rule of law. Many of them will never register. They will have time to scatter and go underground during the registration period. She would never be able to deport them at that point. In the end they would remain here permanently even without registering. Palin essentially would allow illegals to have priority over the thousands of foreigners waiting to enter the country legally. All this would happen only after she deems the borders secure thereby allowing illegals to remain in the country far beyond the registration period.
43 posted on 03/30/2011 4:51:26 AM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Where did you hear that/

Read post #43.
44 posted on 03/30/2011 5:01:24 AM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

Ron Paul (55% Votes)
Sarah Palin (28% Votes)
Herman Cain (4% Votes)
Donald Trump (3% Votes)
Michele Bachmann (3% Votes)
Mitt Romney (1% Votes)
Newt Gingrich (1% Votes)
Tim Pawlenty (1% Votes)
Mitch Daniels (1% Votes)
Mike Huckabee (1% Votes)
John Bolton (1% Votes)
Haley Barbour (1% Votes)
Rick Santorum (0% Votes)
Jon Huntsman (0% Votes)
Charles Roemer III (0% Votes)
George Pataki (0% Votes)


45 posted on 03/30/2011 7:35:57 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
I hope it brings the truth out, what Trump said. Even Hannity is now saying, why cant they just show everything, so maybe it will be helpful????

I hope so!

46 posted on 03/30/2011 8:09:32 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012, PLEASE LORD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

“Ron Paul (55% Votes)
Sarah Palin (28% Votes)
Herman Cain (4% Votes)
Donald Trump (3% Votes)
Michele Bachmann (3% Votes)
Mitt Romney (1% Votes)
Newt Gingrich (1% Votes)
Tim Pawlenty (1% Votes)
Mitch Daniels (1% Votes)
Mike Huckabee (1% Votes)
John Bolton (1% Votes)
Haley Barbour (1% Votes)
Rick Santorum (0% Votes)
Jon Huntsman (0% Votes)
Charles Roemer III (0% Votes)
George Pataki (0% Votes)”

Another Poll trashed by the Paulie’s.


47 posted on 03/30/2011 9:33:44 AM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Defend Liberty

“My comment: Not total amnesty? In other words she supports partial amnesty. Partial amnesty”

False. You are putting words in her mouth that she didn’t say, but that you want her to say.

Think of it this way. Would you support total amnesty? No. So your answer would also be “Not total amnesty.”

Read this again, and stop trying to put words in her mouth she didn’t say:

“American citizens who are - who are here lawfully - they need to be the ones with the first shot at getting these jobs. We cannot make it easy on those who have chosen to be illegal - illegally here, to disobey our laws. No!


48 posted on 03/30/2011 4:27:24 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Sarah Palin is above taking the fake high road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
False. You are putting words in her mouth that she didn’t say, but that you want her to say.

That is her quote from the interview.

Palin's quote you cite "We cannot make it easy on those who have chosen to be illegal - illegally here, to disobey our laws. No!

This statement couldn't be more disingenuous since she will be making it easier for them to remain in the country while giving while in the country and permanently, at least for some, once they register. That's after some indeterminate amount of time passes before she decides the borders are secure. That is amnesty for illegals regardless how you spin the concept.

If she is so adamant they obey our laws then why doesn't she support enforcing the current federal immigration laws that require all illegal aliens be deported and do not include allowing them to remain in the country by registering?
49 posted on 03/30/2011 4:57:18 PM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Defend Liberty

Her quote doesn’t prove your point. Only your words, the words you want to put in her mouth, seem to make sense.

But only to you.


50 posted on 03/30/2011 5:28:33 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Sarah Palin is above taking the fake high road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

Yep! The paulbots got a hold of it.


51 posted on 03/30/2011 5:33:25 PM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (Where is our military?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

“Yep! The paulbots got a hold of it.”

That is what I thought,When you see him take off like that,there is a bunch of evil going on LOL.


52 posted on 03/30/2011 5:47:14 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Her quote doesn’t prove your point. Only your words, the words you want to put in her mouth, seem to make sense.

I've cited only her quotes. Words that have come freely from her own mouth. Why don't you cite some sources showing her comments unequivocally stating we need to enforce current federal immigration laws by deporting any illegal aliens in the country without the condition of allowing them time to register?
53 posted on 03/30/2011 7:16:41 PM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Defend Liberty

No, you cited her quotes and then added your comments.

Surely I don’t need to tell you that your comments are not Palin’s words.


54 posted on 03/31/2011 5:53:10 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Sarah Palin is above taking the fake high road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
No, you cited her quotes and then added your comments.

Surely I don’t need to tell you that your comments are not Palin’s words.


Try using some common sense. You're not seeing the forest for the trees. I purposely stated they were my comments to avoid them being misinterpreted as her words!
55 posted on 04/01/2011 4:01:09 AM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Defend Liberty

But you can’t criticize Sarah Palin by criticizing your own words and pretending they were spoken by Palin. It’s a bit silly, to say the least.


56 posted on 04/02/2011 3:13:46 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Sarah Palin is above taking the fake high road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
But you can’t criticize Sarah Palin by criticizing your own words and pretending they were spoken by Palin.

I can criticize her when I cite comments she made in those interviews in my earlier posts.
57 posted on 04/02/2011 7:22:28 PM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson