Posted on 12/03/2010 9:19:18 PM PST by DoctorZIn
Inquiring minds are reading an intriguing and frightening article by Greg Hunter entitled, “Foreclosure Bombshell“. Mr. Hunter gives the best explanation (yours truly included) of the explosive problem surrounding foreclosures.
The issue centers around the ‘note’…namely its location and why that is so important: ...
(Excerpt) Read more at survivingcalifornia.wordpress.com ...
It was a 15-year fixed-rate loan originated in 1987 that was paid off in 2002. I had never heard of ABN AMRO until I contacted Atlantic Mortgage to find out what the deal was with my title problem. It was they who told me I needed to contact ABN AMRO to get the satisfaction piece recorded. (shrug) I was under the impression at the time that Atlantic had just (roughly coincidental with my payoff) gone out of business and was “cleaning up” and sending the remnants of its business to ABN AMRO.
I tried to get a link to the Law Journal article, but it’s behind a paywall.
My guess is we’ll hear more on this sooner rather than later
What? Have you missed the Nub blog pimping zots? Its happened.
That would explain it. They probably outsourced the maintenance of the mortgage origination and history to ABN AMRO as they went out of business. As Atlantic had a legal obligation to see to it the records were retained for the life of the loan plus seven years, that's likely what happened.
:)
glad to hear that. I tend to think faster than I can type..... not gonna comment further on that LOL
Anyway, I am glad that what I meant was clear. As opposed to what I said, which may not have been so clear... :)
Have a great day!
Is scotch close enough? IPA?
LOL
Just not true Danae.
Nothing in FRs rules read you have to respond after posting a thread. I admit it is suspect of troll activity ,yet how is that worse than FRs blog haters that spam every blogger thread?
Hassling the bloggers who post within Frs rules does not make FR a better place.
I have questioned mod activity when they placate the blog hater's. I will continue to do it as long as I am on FR!
If “blog pimping” (whatever that is) violates board rules, imo, Jim needs to put up guidelines of what cannot be posted in the Bloggers forum.
If he does not want blogs linked, why even have a Bloggers forum? It makes no sense.
If he does not want blogs linked, why even have a Bloggers forum? It makes no sense.
The Blog haters on FR have their own set of made up rules. They disrupt blogger threads with their spam comments . On excerpted threads they post the whole text of the writings from the bloggers website out of spite.
Their hassling of Todd Warner Huston is an example of their actions.
Yes, well there is a cadre of gumble hunners.
This account has been banned or suspended. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And continue to post. It is a diruptor cell within FR.
I was just pointing something out. I wasn’t making a commentary on it. Sorry if I didn’t make myself clear enough. Sheesh. Sorry, my bad!
Don, hold up a moment ok? I was pointing something out. I wasn’t making a commentary on it. I have seem people who sign up only to post their blogs, get zotted. I didn’t comment on whether it was right or not. Thats not for me to decide - it’s not my website. I just pointed it out.
You really don't know why someone is zotted. You and I can only surmise. Could may well be a retread trying to post and has nothing to do with the blog.
You or no one else has produced an FR rule that your idea of "blogpimping" is against FRs rules.
Yes you are right, and its a tolerated disruptor cell. LOL.
Good for you.
SO the rules are different depending on where the blog is pimped.Similarly, the rules may shift depending on the volume of pimped blogs, after all it is a form of free advertising to increase blog site hits and get a leg up in the blog-o-sphere search engine universe.
Some pimped blogs I have visited have little to add to FR discourse. Others are quite cutting edge on the information end. So your mileage may vary, and so do the posting rules. I can live with that.
But I also believe blog pimping has a cost with concern trolls peddling their disinformation on conservative causes, especially in matters of controversey among Republicans.When Rit Momsey begins his presideLDStial run, you will see many blogs pimped here dedicated to his cogs ( cause).Same happened with Pon Raul.History and records are "rewritten." Facts are skewed and spun. Some subscribers open dual FR accounts and can actually post to themselves back and forth as if they were two people arguing with each other. Solid freepers get a kick out of catching them.Very entertaining.
Overall,I think it makes FR very much a central forum and far less boring than it otherwise would be.And the 1st amendment goes through a continuous cycle of rebirth.
You got a blog and you want it certified, forged on the anvil of truth? Post it here if you dare.
You got a big mouth for someone who's been around a long time. Like that old timer who sits at the end of the bar jabbering who still thinks he can whoop everybody because no one's stood up to him in 30 years..
FR is here for people to post their opinions, not links to their opinions.
You'll have to point that out to me in the "about" section.
I have a question I suppose I could answer myself but I'm lazy and dumb. I have a blog that is rather controversial and frowned upon by many here and purely non-profit. But in my mind the content is helpful to many.
If you make a post that links to a personal blog does it appear in the "Main" FR page?
If the post appears on the "bloggers" FR page only why would people elect to bash them? Wouldn't the blogger bashers have to deliberately elect to visit the FR blogger page?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.