Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sensible Liberals: The 34 Democrats Who Voted NO
Vocal Minority ^ | 3/22/10 | EricTheRed

Posted on 03/22/2010 11:18:55 AM PDT by EricTheRed_VocalMinority

The health (s)care bill last night was actually bi-partisan—bi-partisan opposition, that is. These are the 34 Dems who voted no yesterday. And if any of them are in your district, call and thank them. They deserve it:

Rep. John Adler (N.J.), Rep. Jason Altmire (Pa.), Rep. Michael Arcuri (N.Y.), Rep. John Barrow (Ga.), Rep. Marion Berry (Ark.), Rep. Dan Boren (Okla.), Rep. Rick Boucher (Va.), Rep. Bobby Bright (Ala.), Rep. Ben Chandler (Ky.), Rep. Travis Childers (Miss.), Rep. Artur Davis (Ala.), Rep. Lincoln Davis (Tenn.), Rep. Chet Edwards (Texas), Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (S.D.), Rep. Tim Holden (Pa.), Rep. Larry Kissell (N.C.), Rep. Frank Kratovil (Md.), Rep. Dan Lipinski (Ill.), Rep. Stephen Lynch (Mass.), Rep. Jim Marshall (Ga.), Rep. Jim Matheson (Utah), Rep. Mike McIntyre (N.C.), Rep. Mike McMahon (N.Y.), Rep. Charlie Melancon (La.), Rep. Walt Minnick (Idaho), Rep. Glenn Nye (Va.), Rep. Collin Peterson (Minn.), Rep. Mike Ross (Ark.), Rep. Heath Shuler (N.C.), Rep. Ike

(Excerpt) Read more at vocalminority.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: sensibledemocrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last
To: AdamBomb

Exactly. It was a CYA to help soften the political fallout come november. It’s all about power, nothing else.


81 posted on 03/22/2010 12:42:48 PM PDT by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thulldud
This is great! 32 comments and every one (unless I missed it) correctly states that these "nays" were strictly for camouflage!

It is true that many are starting to see through the deal, dare we call it conspiracy.

It is still depressing how many do not. When one is an organization man, a yes-man, one is indeed covered by the organization (incl. financing), until one's number is called. This has only been an MO among the corrupt since humanity organized.

Although many on this website refuse to see it, similarly maintaining that the "Republican Party" is the only way to stop the Left is exactly wrong. The Republican Party is also an organization man, i.e. a yes-man. And when and if they acquire power there is again only some myopic orchestrated agenda from the top, with reaction and conflict all over again.

This is the logical fallacy of Game Theory, you against me; the most sophisticated versions being The Prisoner's Dilemma, or from the Cold War, Mutually Assured Destruction. This logic is fallible.

When an evil like Leftism (centralized dependence and control of individual humanity) is rampant but widely recognized and loathed, then it is critical to invoke creative, multiple, spearheads, in today's political circumstances third or fourth or fifth parties.

Imagine a national debate with five participants, four of whom ruthlessly expose the corruption and human violation of the LEFT. Expose it from all sides, its deal making, its arrogance, its avarice, its incivility, its juvenilism.

Does any one expect The Republican Party, on its own, to do this?

Yet over and over here we see the frustrated "Republican" organization man trying to re-straighten the Party. This frustration is what The Tea Party is about, and we give them all encouragement to go wide and put the elitist conspiracy of "parties" in general in perspective.

Johnny Suntrade

82 posted on 03/22/2010 12:54:47 PM PDT by jnsun (The Left: the need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: EricTheRed_VocalMinority


Sensible Liberals: The 34 Democrats Who Voted NO

Yeah, right.

At least for one of them, Ike Skelton of MO...it was surely a CYA move.
Trying to sound like he feared for our military vets.

What a hypocrite.


83 posted on 03/22/2010 1:19:27 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

The “proud” was sarcasm.

Vote Them Out!


84 posted on 03/22/2010 2:04:40 PM PDT by Williams (It's the policies, stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson