We will take care of any trouble our way.
Criminals want fewer police! Stop the presses!
I would gladly trade all police protection for the right to defend myself and my family with any and all means at my disposal.
Police do not protect you from crminals they clean up after them.
Now I will say this. I believe the true answer is to let all Americans defend themselves with any and all means at their disposal, and drastically reduce the police force.
Due to the fact that police can take ones freedom, police necessarily need to be very moral and just. The fact of the matter is that very few have the morals to be a true justice of the peace. Therefore their numbers need to be small and their vetting process massive.
A well armed citizenry, allowed to justly defend itself, can lead to a small enough police force, that it can be filled only with the good people and throw out the bad immediately.
I think that the effect of abolishing police in the cities might not be ss bad as one might think. In the cities, police are just as likely, if not more so, to arrest a law abiding citizen exercising his 2nd Amendment rights for a “gun crime” as they are to arrest a murderer, robber etc. Remove the police and you get rid of “gun crimes”. Hence more law abiding citizens will be armed, effectively INCREASING police presence.
After all, what is a police officer? When discussing crime and gun control liberals like to talk as though policemen are some magical solution as in “You don’t need a gun; call the police.” Of course police officers are really nothing more than law abiding citizens carrying guns. They are highly trained to do what they do, and they certainly have my respect for doing it, but that’s really what they are. Creating larger numbers of law abiding citizens with guns certainly would be a positive development.
These anarchists are already engaged in street justice. If another pusher invades your territory and competes for your drug customers, blow them away. It is no different than KKK lynching in the old days.
One of the things these idiots forget is that the police are there to protect THEM.
With no police, the law-abiding would get tired of crime, notice a common factor in perpetrators, and take appropriate action, which might be unfortunate for certain communities.
If she expects people to take her seriously, she should at least stop lying.
The first municipal police forces in the United States:
Boston - 1838; New York City - 1845; Albany - 1851; Chicago, 1851
None of these cities had need of a "slave patrol" - so there was obviously some other non-slave-related reason for organizing paid police forces.
Note to race-baiters: Not EVERYTHING is about race.
In the days of newspapers, it cost money for paper and ink, and the heavy newspapers needed to be delivered. Therefore newspapers had editors to see that vomitus like this never saw the light of day.
Articles like this are what the old saying, “not worth the paper it’s printed on” was for.
This is literacy porn.
No offense to you for posting it, 2dvet. Someone has to understand what the loonies are up to. Hope the FBI is aware of this “activist.”