This is the second time you have called me a troll on this thread that I started. You have done the same thing on other threads that I started.
So who is the troll, Brown Deer?
Wouldn’t that be someone who goes onto a thread that someone else started and insults them for merely defending the clear premise of the thread?
Fred Nerks’ comment #147 about BHO Sr. and Tom Mboya is actually part of a tangential Mal-Val narrative sub-plot, but a main thrust for FN has been to discredit any evidence that would place BHO Sr. together with SADO in Russian class at UH in the fall of 1960. This effort by FN is apparently designed to help persuade FReepers that Malcolm X could be Barry’s dad by knocking back BHO Sr. as a candidate.
So although comment #147 is not the first explicit Mal-Val comment by FN it is tangentially Mal-Val, IMO.
FN posted numerous blatant Mal-Val comments later including the infamous “two boys” pics and the two Asian women near BHO Sr.
This is Mal-Val trolling by FN and you, Brown Deer, are obviously trolling in support of FN, as usual.
I can’t help but noticing that neither Fred Nerks nor Brown Deer dispute a single element of the Mal-Val narrative that I have attributed to them. I have read FN’s comments very carefully over the past two years and I am probably the foremost expert on the Mal-Val narrative who is not a believer/troller!
YOU'VE BEEN FOLLOWING ME LIKE A BAD ODOUR FOR TWO YEARS AND HAVEN'T CONTRIBUTED A THING!
You own the narrative. You picked it up from here and there in little bits like the rag-picking garbage collector you are; nothing new, not a single contribution from you, just a continued diatribe against everything I have written.
FOR TWO FRIKKEN YEARS!
DO YOU HEAR YOURSELF? SO WHO'S A TROLL, SEIZETHECRAP?