Posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:42 PM PST by Seizethecarp
Today, I had a conversation with an investigator from the Cold Case Posse in AZ. We talked and I expanded on several dossiers filled with evidence for over an hour. They asked for all of my relevant information on Obama, the Harry Bounel alias evidence, and the dossiers I completed on Stanley Ann Dunham, her parents, and Michelle Obama as well. They have it all. BTW they also say that it looks like my information cannot be disproved and will be useful.
I have proof, definitive proof that Stanley Ann Dunham was in WA state in "1961" as per the issuance of a SSN numident in her name with the SSN 535-40-8522. There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Homeland Security was introduced by GW Bush. I remember it well, because it made the hair on the back of my neck stand up. Turns out, the Department was in the planning stages for years, and Bush used 9/11/2001 as the trigger to implement it.
I had not read that. If that type of mob rule spreads to suburban prepared people it will be really ugly!
Imagine how the press will call that racist!
We sometimes have flash gang events here that are very big since work is not available for these 20-35 year old men. Not many since the cool weather though...summer heat?
That needs a sarcasm tag!
I would worry more about those who are storing lots of seeds. They might snap and commit assault planting in Agriculture Free Zones.
I thought you said you were worried about those people!?!
About a month after the election I received a letter from my senator saying the congress met and agreed that the people had the facts and voted anyway so they would not do anything to overthrow the will of the voters.
End of story, he seemed to say. All the court blocking I have observed shows a planned way to scuttle all objections.
I think I was referring to your saying there was nothing bad happening today. ( I had just read the link to Black violence)
I know you are being sarcastic but that is where I was coming from. What is the outlet for all this investment in preparedness for upheaval. Maybe it just loses steam...but I wonder at the amount of mental involvement whether some small event triggers a huge response.
The sheriff meets with the people and says arm yourselves I can not be there for everyone...etc. Makes me wonder??
those who are becoming armed, storing food, buying land and seeds.
...and you were replying to that reply. (See upthread.)
I don’t know what you’re wondering about. Either things are going badly and people need to prepare or things are going swell and they’re preparing for nothing. I’ve been armed since my 15th B-day in 1970 and have been buying guns and ammo ever since then. So have almost all the people I know. There is nothing new about that in my world.
Exactly. There is even the woman who know Stanley Ann in the Seattle boarding house in 1961. Her name is Mary Toutonghi. How Stanley Ann and Baby Barry got to Seattle, Washington is the big question. The airline records during that period have been mysteriously destroyed. I believe Stanley Ann and Baby Barry flew from Kenya to Vancouver BC and drove (or took the ferry) to Seattle.
As a matter of fact, two missionaries in Kenya witnessed late term pregnant Stanley Ann at Nairobi airport being denied boarding.
Nothing would have prevented a mixed race mother and child to fly out from Nairobi to Vancouver BC. However, there were missionaries who did witness late term Stanley Ann being denied air travel in Nairobi because of her pregnancy.
Harry Bounel
Sounds tres francais.
Is it a giant white rabbit?
He might as well offer 50 trillion. What difference would that make since the records no longer exist?
Why were the slain missionaries talking in late 2006/early 2007 about Dunham being denied access to a flight in 1961? Obama wasn’t on anyone’s radar at that point.
I told my wife about a dream I had, where I kept shooting the bad guy and the bullets just hit his shirt slowly and then dribbled onto the floor.
She quipped “Probably now that you got your concealed carry license your brain is going ‘what good is having a gun if I can’t kill someone’”.
That was many years ago. Now she wants her own pistol for her birthday!
Oh. STILL haven’t shot anyone.
You may underestimate the terminal stupidity of enough of the American people to keep him going to the end of his term.
I have been theaching college students for 35, almost 40 years. The incoming class last fall was noticeably stupider and politically totally out of the loop, unconcerned, frighteningly stupid than even 5 years ago. Their contempt for anything traditional or conservative is appalling.
Yes, scattered among them are more genuine conservatives than in the past, but the main momentum is toward terminal stupidity. They will let Obama get away with murder. They do not even know how to inform themselves such that they know whether things are getting better or worse. They live in a prolonged adolescent bubble (kept afloat by waves of Obama spending for student loans etc.).
Yes, it will crash. But he will blame you and me, blame the Republicans, blame the Christians, blame anyone who has opposed or resisted him.
And the students I am seeing in my classroom will believe him, not me. They despise me. They roll their eyes at me. They are offended that their pretty little adolescent ears have to be sullied by words contrary to the heavenly strains of “All’s Right With the World” as long as we can get rid of those negativity-inducing political conservatives.
“Leave me alone. I don’t want to hear any more about politics, about economics, about Obamanations. I want my head in the sand. I want my Mommy to come make it right.”
“Get out of my life. Don’t confuse me with hard truths. You’re mean.”
That’s what I hear from them.
Zer0 was on someone’s radar screen. The keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention (DNC) was given by then Illinois State Senator, United States Senate candidate, and future President Barack H. Obama.
“I’m willing to keep an open mind on Obama’s eligibility, but I’m also pragmatic. President Obama was elected twice. “
Richard Milhouse Nixon might argue that point.
Wasnt Malcolm in Seattle for some convention in 1961?
No one is going to remove a sitting president on his second term.
____________________________________
August 9, 1974
Thanks for the Ping.
While it’s true that Nixon was removed from office in his second term, Nixon was a Republican. I should have been more specific. No one is going to remove President Obama on his second term. He’s not only a Democrat. He’s a minority, and his party controls the US Senate. Meaning? We’re stuck with him for another four years.
“No one is going to remove President Obama on his second term.”
You don’t know that.
You’re right. I don’t know President Obama won’t be impeached. He might be. I just think it’s extremely unlikely. He did survive one term already.
I know that you've already received a fair amount of grief over your #11 comments especially, but in deciding whether or not it's "worth it" to go after these criminals and make every effort to expose their crimes at every opportunity, consider:
These grifters have posted this piece of garbage on our taxpayer-funded WH computer servers. So what we have here is the use of government office and equipment in the commission and furtherance of serious felonies, up to and possibly including theft of office through usurpation despite ineligibility.
At a minimum, we the citizenry should be able to have some degree of certainty as to whether or not 20th Amendment Section 3 has been satisfied, and if so, how and verified by whom, and with access to any proofs offered. Right is right; the constitution and the Rule of Law matter, else all else is moot.
Your own tagline is instructive:
"Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for."
Thanks for the Ping, Nully.
I think you are underestimating what attitudes there were in “the most liberal families” in 1960. I was actually in one at the time! The Dunhams went to the “Little Red Church,” a Unitarian Universalist church (name says it all), and the Mercer Island HS was an island of Marxist third-world liberation and diversity-loving enthusiasts, it would seem.
No doubt HI and WA are liberal states, and the Dunhams were quite ultra liberal....but even a liberal white family (esp one comfortably middle class like the Dunhams) back in that time would not have publicly made available their 18 yr old daughter with her half white/black child....with the father nowhere around.
I also seriously doubt that an airline flying from Hawaii had any thoughts at all about mixed race baby from the state with the highest level of mixed races. That is a silly assertion.
Not silly at all. Especially when most whites in Hawaii are called “Haleole” by Hawaiians/non-whites (Hawaiian for “honky”, “cracker”).
Hawaii has a history of racism, all races did not get along and sing Tiny Bubbles with each other.
Yes, something would have been said and done with a young unaccompanied white woman with a mixed race baby in 1961 Hawaii...and one without a military background
Nothing would have prevented a mixed race mother and child to fly out from Nairobi to Vancouver BC. However, there were missionaries who did witness late term Stanley Ann being denied air travel in Nairobi because of her pregnancy.
Interesting regarding the denied air travel in Nairobi.
HM: “Their contempt for anything traditional or conservative is appalling.”
I’ve noticed this, too. There used to be at least some respect for Christians even if one didn’t believe in Christianity. Now non-Christians are heavily propagandized. I even see it here. It’s like they think Christians are on the verge of creating a theocracy or something.
Phillipians 4:8:
Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things.
Most people nowadays are way too busy to think about anything beyond the most simple materialistic matters of life, like what’s for dinner, let’s get drunk, and who do I get to hook up with next. Sin? Why that’s just something backward thumpers use to try and make people feel guilty.
BTW, they aren’t stupid or uneducated. They certainly know far more about worldly things at a much younger age than my generation. They just haven’t spent much time analyzing what they do or thinking about the long term ramifications. Even their popular music glorifies living for today.
My question is....
If technology has clearly and without any doubt demonstrated Ubama’s BC is a digital fraud, why can’t that be used to dispose America of his garbage?
I know...rhetorical, but if we can’t get the most obvious evidence reviewed by SCOTUS, then I doubt any evidence will ever see the SCOTUS chambers.
Maybe but why would it be on two ex-missionaries radar? Especially two ex-missionaries that weren’t even in Kenya in 1961. They were in Uganda.
I have no problem with people who want to pursue the eligibility issue. Why would I? I believe in liberty. What bothered me wasn’t the pursuit of the eligibility issue. It was the bashing of good conservatives, like Mark Levin and Michelle Malkin, simply because they didn’t see elegibility as the #1 concern.
Some of the Truther stuff borders on the absurd. Other information seems promising. I’d actually like to see the SCOTUS rule on eligibility and give us a solid definition of “natural born citizen.”
Sealed OLFBC due to an adoption may be obtained by adult adoptees in some states. To minimize the risk the OLFBC will marked with a statement indicating it is not a legal document.
In Alabama, an unsealed OLFBC is clearly marked with "THIS IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT" to prevent it from being used as identification.
Obama had to edit his OLFBC before posting it to remove "THIS IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT" from it so he could continue the lie he was not adopted by Lolo Soetoro.
Levin, Malkin, Limbaugh, Hannity...yap, yap, yap, ‘ka-ching’, yap, yap, yap, ‘ka-ching’...you buy their books, you hang on their every word, and the country continues to go down the drain...they’re just a ‘sounding board’; no more, no less.
And that is the fruit of the Left's long march through the education system. It took them several generations, but the long view has given them a permanent base of Jonestown cool aid drinkers that no amount of information will ever sway.
The Dunhams had Obama living with them as their grandson for many years. They didn’t act embarrassed about it.
Bttt
nice work troll - your check is likely in the mail - head off to twitter now
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2908395/posts?q=1&;page=251
see post 274— only 1 dependent Maya
Revelation 911: “nice work troll”
ROFLOL!
People who are stuck on the eligibility issue, aka Truthers, wonder why other conservatives, like Levin and Malkin, dismiss them. Some Truthers are simply not willing to listen to any dissenting views. It doesn’t matter if I agree with some of the Truther agenda. If I don’t buy into all of it and believe Obama is ineligible to be president, then I’m a troll! Again, you wonder why many conservatives dismiss Truthers. Truthers bring derision on themselves by closing their minds to anything that disputes their Obama worldview.
Even if I think Obama is hiding something (I do) and think some of his documents are fake (I do), it doesn’t mean he’s doing so to cover up foreign citizenship. It only means he’s hiding something.
For sake of argument, let’s say he really is a Manchurian Candidate born outside of the US and groomed by Muslims since an early age to become president. Even if all that’s true—I think it’s nonsense—Truthers still need to find conclusive evidence, get a favorable ruling from the courts, and push impeachment through an openly hostile US Senate.
And I’m a troll for pointing it out!
762X51: “That statement is a blatant lie sir.”
Geesh! OK, technically there’s a way, a tool, that could be used to impeach President Obama. However, that tool is not going to be used as a practical matter. Do you seriously think the Democrat-controlled senate would impeach their guy even if a court ruled he’s ineligible? Remember who we’re dealing with. Democrats do whatever it takes to win.
Truthers claim there’s a big conspiracy to cover up Obama’s eligibility, right? This conspiracy is in the highest levels of the Democrat Party, right? Millions upon millions voted for Obama in spite of all the new eligibility “evidence” since 2008, right? Yet, I’m expected to believe the people will exert enough pressure on the US Senate for it to vote to impeach the guy they supposedly conspired with to keep in office? Sorry. That boggles the mind.
I’d rather try to thwart the Obama agenda. THAT actually can be accomplished. It’s possible.
Our government is corrupted to the point where treason has become the standard operating basis. It got that way because good Americans didn't raise the roof at the first transgression.
They sat in their easy chairs and grumbled, but they didn't tar and feather the bastards like they should have. They didn't write letters to the editors of their local papers by the bale. They didn't show up at city council meetings to express their disgust and anger at the politicians who were slowly dismantling their very way of life.
Go ahead and 'accept reality' if you must, but don't stop telling the enemy that you've got his number, and that you're coming for him. Fight back, even on issues you don't think you'll win. The bastards have to know that we're on to them, and that we reject what they're doing to us.
OBOTS have certainly won the message war by insisting PROOF must be presented before trial.
The truth is that allegations are assumed to be true in a civil matter. Court rules indicate a Judge must read a complaint from the perspective the allegations made by the plaintiff are true. If the case survives a responsive pleading, i.e. Motion to Dismiss, then the defendant must answer the complaint with a denial of the allegations. If the defendant does not deny the allegations, then the Court will find the allegations to be true and proceed to a hearing accessing damages caused by the defendant.
For example, let’s say Orly Taitz complained in Federal Court that Sven Magnussen was not eligible to post on Free Republic because he is using a stolen SSN, did not register for Selective Service and Sven’s real name is Harrison or Harry J. Bounel who’s identity I have stolen according to E-Verify, SSNVS and numerous affidavits from skip tracers and private detectives.
I ignore the complaint and summons to appear. I do not file a responsive pleading or answer to the complaint.
If that is the case, then Orly wins and all of the allegations made in the complaint are considered to be true and factually based. Since Obama and I are too busy and too important to answer civil suits, then Orly will win every time if she could get past the Motion to Dismiss. No proof will be necessary since the allegations in a civil suit are assumed to be true until successfully defended.
Well, in 1974, Richard Nixon, a sitting president in his second term (having won that second term in a true landslide election), would have been removed via impeachment had he not resigned first. The vice-president at the time, Gerald Ford, was sworn in as president. And there was no "absolute chaos" to speak of.
So it has happened before.
“see post 274— only 1 dependent Maya”
I didn’t see this earlier. Yes, Maya was the only dependent on the Soetoro tax return because Obama was in the legal custody of Catholic Social Services of Connecticut in 1973 and the physical custody of Madelyn Payne Dunham. His grandmother was appointed his legal guardian or foster mother.
Stanley Ann and Lolo Soetoro were stripped of their parental rights by a Hawaii Family Court in 1971 when Obama returned to Hawaii as an Unaccompanied Minor with foreign nationality. He was taken into protective custody by ICE at the Hawaii airport and then transferred to Catholic Social Services of Connecticut until the age of majority, 1979. On his 18th birthday, Obama was an emancipated adult.
In the 1980 Soetoro divorce, Obama is the adult dependent upon the Soetoros for education. From 1971 to 1979, the Soetoros could not claim Obama has a dependent because he was in the care and legal custody of Catholic Social Services of Connecticut. Consequently, he has a Connecticut SSN issued to him through his legal custodian, Catholic Social Services of Connecticut.
It's only a matter of time before obama is in the same boat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.